Received: by 2002:a25:e7d8:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e207csp1864915ybh; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 08:44:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvwyGkU34pNXqNNW9KqCLCEsDq/QaNbowYVBYcBupIhc23Ok8TQFIKG36lQqwBDNwkt3chD X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:4cd:: with SMTP id a13mr7690887oie.137.1584114243397; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 08:44:03 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1584114243; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=l6tTDa9tVlyn2HxzQ8D3HMBi3Hqqs16t1GJ3haHrSDDX3uc3sMKkgy12n8LJqs+sov w13x9G8sQ9bZ4P/J34MF75wYahKd/nKzasdliK4DrnKP57xOAN8CLGyjzSSR0lP/2x2d kfNST8ZDI6K+Bqj9sfhkdMuZqTN+T4zmYB9VtZMbK1VF9T1FV+VtqrBhQKitNqGHlJa0 WDxt1DCxzR+lrOLiPDCAztyLvM6aA9YbndiM1vQiPTdYU5+eiLWG9itNGq/7vbFdnUQ3 dJ47G90IRI7udsRDk2F0UhN9Kix1QPCn8oLTU/KO8jIl5bKiavS4B3SAfPoMbujo835c ypHg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=OavQGT0mBARNpAYUBUEFQAM0uDNGa09EAEZEKjpbA+4=; b=nkZfOa4t1b0/wZ+lW1ROqb9sbw++EEEzauJMU5FAo9sZQVzqfEm5Z128BO4UJIYbQL /2eAq9EjB5mhMJoTZo5gVRrw0Zb0EVB0nhyOdD3UbZOkC5wUUZQjKUxOlc7lCvkkno7q w9m5fBzbhtZ71VddD9KqzT+n+cdnulvg1Q1laZUHaDAmW+HgYphf71sGOXpTZfLsWy5c JL5znjvOfQuJSfSpv1mNlArzGULKGDNUl82RbeSQDWyuZta2/IpiDr4btcOK/VN9cm2D APiIRsIqJByzl8z38Gy9ivu2/QwbkDcw2hzMxEJMMx6hjacx7SZzVkxqnYbBq0huD8tW 0l7w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g23si5206757otn.212.2020.03.13.08.43.51; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 08:44:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726691AbgCMPmF (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 13 Mar 2020 11:42:05 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:46536 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726420AbgCMPmE (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2020 11:42:04 -0400 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D6BE7206B7; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 15:42:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 11:42:02 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Sasha Levin Cc: Jani Nikula , "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , "tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [Tech-board-discuss] [Ksummit-discuss] Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections -- Change to charter Message-ID: <20200313114202.3bf423ea@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20200313130536.GD1349@sasha-vm> References: <6d6dd6fa-880f-01fe-6177-281572aed703@labbott.name> <20200312003436.GF1639@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> <20200313031947.GC225435@mit.edu> <87d09gljhj.fsf@intel.com> <20200313093548.GA2089143@kroah.com> <877dzolf7n.fsf@intel.com> <20200313130536.GD1349@sasha-vm> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 13 Mar 2020 09:05:36 -0400 Sasha Levin wrote: > Personally, I think that our definition of who can vote should be "any > member of our community", but it's not practical, right? The question is, how do you define "any member of the community". Should drive by patch senders have the same influence as the a maintainer that is spending hours working on the project? It really comes down to what is the TAB? It is the Linux Foundation's Technical Advisory Board. As the name suggests, its the way to have influence to the Linux Foundation on behalf of the Linux kernel community. I really believe that those with the largest stakes in the success of the Linux kernel have the most influence. Otherwise we could easily end up with mob mentality and get the same kind of representation that the United States currently has. -- Steve