Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751239AbWBRM54 (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Feb 2006 07:57:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751219AbWBRMzP (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Feb 2006 07:55:15 -0500 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.31.123]:27547 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751217AbWBRMzG (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Feb 2006 07:55:06 -0500 Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:32:50 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Kyle Moffett Cc: Pavel Machek , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Nigel Cunningham , suspend2-devel@lists.suspend2.net, Lee Revell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Message-ID: <20060216213250.GE3490@openzaurus.ucw.cz> References: <20060201113710.6320.68289.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20060209233406.GD3389@elf.ucw.cz> <200602101008.32368.nigel@suspend2.net> <200602101337.22078.rjw@sisk.pl> <20060210233507.GC1952@elf.ucw.cz> <70FB74EB-5503-432D-8749-FD5A6807C23C@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <70FB74EB-5503-432D-8749-FD5A6807C23C@mac.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1361 Lines: 28 Hi! > >Anyway, it means that suspend is still quite a hot topic, and that > >is good. (Linus said that suspend-to-disk is basically for people > >that can't get suspend-to-RAM to work, and after I got suspend-to- > >RAM to work reliably here, I can see his point). > > I completely agree. My Mac PowerBook has had suspend-to-RAM for a > long time; I shut the lid and about 3 seconds later it's asleep, open > it and 3 seconds later it's awake. Leave it sleeping for a week on a > full charge, come back to find it still asleep. I can even put it to > sleep, remove a drained battery and put in a fresh one (it has a > small internal 2-minute RAM battery), then wake it up and resume > work. I'm curious though, what proportion of laptop hardware > actually has support for suspend-to-RAM? (including hardware for > which linux does not yet have support). What percent of that > hardware _does_ have Linux support? 99%+ of notebooks can do s-t-ram, and perhaps 50% desktops. Linux should work on 70% or so... -- 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/