Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200223011154.GY23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20200301215125.GA873525@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
 <20200313235303.GP23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20200313235303.GP23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:50:51 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHk-=whainTcvgF01vsSmN+y7s7U1qMA-QbM5qFQ3s4xQHwaJw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCHSET] sanitized pathwalk machinery (v4)
To:     Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 4:53 PM Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
>         Review and testing would be _very_ welcome;

I didn't notice anythign else than the few things I sent out to
individual patches.

But I have to say, 69 patches is too long of a series to review. I
think you could send them out as multiple series (you describe them
that way anyway - parts 1-7) with a day in between.

Because my eyes were starting to glaze over about halfway in the series.

But don't do it for this version. If you do a #5. But it would be good
to be in -next regardless of whether you do a #5 or not.

                 Linus