Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 16 Mar 2020 11:48:50 -0400
From:   Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To:     "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
        RCU <rcu@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/6] rcu: rename __is_kfree_rcu_offset() macro
Message-ID: <20200316154850.GG190951@google.com>
References: <20200315181840.6966-1-urezki@gmail.com>
 <20200315181840.6966-5-urezki@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200315181840.6966-5-urezki@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 07:18:38PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) wrote:
> Rename __is_kfree_rcu_offset to __is_kvfree_rcu_offset.
> All RCU paths use kvfree() now instead of kfree(), thus
> rename it.

This patch LGTM:
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>

thanks,

 - Joel
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/rcupdate.h | 6 +++---
>  kernel/rcu/tiny.c        | 2 +-
>  kernel/rcu/tree.c        | 4 ++--
>  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> index bb270221dbdc..e4961631a44f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> @@ -798,16 +798,16 @@ static inline notrace void rcu_read_unlock_sched_notrace(void)
>  
>  /*
>   * Does the specified offset indicate that the corresponding rcu_head
> - * structure can be handled by kfree_rcu()?
> + * structure can be handled by kvfree_rcu()?
>   */
> -#define __is_kfree_rcu_offset(offset) ((offset) < 4096)
> +#define __is_kvfree_rcu_offset(offset) ((offset) < 4096)
>  
>  /*
>   * Helper macro for kfree_rcu() to prevent argument-expansion eyestrain.
>   */
>  #define __kfree_rcu(head, offset) \
>  	do { \
> -		BUILD_BUG_ON(!__is_kfree_rcu_offset(offset)); \
> +		BUILD_BUG_ON(!__is_kvfree_rcu_offset(offset)); \
>  		kfree_call_rcu(head, (rcu_callback_t)(unsigned long)(offset)); \
>  	} while (0)
>  
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tiny.c b/kernel/rcu/tiny.c
> index 3dd8e6e207b0..aa897c3f2e92 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tiny.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tiny.c
> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static inline bool rcu_reclaim_tiny(struct rcu_head *head)
>  	unsigned long offset = (unsigned long)head->func;
>  
>  	rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_callback_map);
> -	if (__is_kfree_rcu_offset(offset)) {
> +	if (__is_kvfree_rcu_offset(offset)) {
>  		trace_rcu_invoke_kvfree_callback("", head, offset);
>  		kvfree((void *)head - offset);
>  		rcu_lock_release(&rcu_callback_map);
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index eef75cd210fd..bb9544238396 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -2719,7 +2719,7 @@ __call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
>  		return; // Enqueued onto ->nocb_bypass, so just leave.
>  	// If no-CBs CPU gets here, rcu_nocb_try_bypass() acquired ->nocb_lock.
>  	rcu_segcblist_enqueue(&rdp->cblist, head);
> -	if (__is_kfree_rcu_offset((unsigned long)func))
> +	if (__is_kvfree_rcu_offset((unsigned long)func))
>  		trace_rcu_kvfree_callback(rcu_state.name, head,
>  					 (unsigned long)func,
>  					 rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&rdp->cblist));
> @@ -2911,7 +2911,7 @@ static void kfree_rcu_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  		rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_callback_map);
>  		trace_rcu_invoke_kvfree_callback(rcu_state.name, head, offset);
>  
> -		if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(!__is_kfree_rcu_offset(offset)))
> +		if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(!__is_kvfree_rcu_offset(offset)))
>  			kvfree((void *)head - offset);
>  
>  		rcu_lock_release(&rcu_callback_map);
> -- 
> 2.20.1
>