Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc:     Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@arm.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>,
        Amit Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>,
        Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@redhat.com>,
        Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
        "H . J . Lu " <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
        Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
        Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
        =?UTF-8?q?Kristina=20Mart=C5=A1enko?= <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
        Sudakshina Das <sudi.das@arm.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v10 06/13] arm64: BTI: Decode BYTPE bits when printing PSTATE
Date:   Mon, 16 Mar 2020 16:50:48 +0000
Message-Id: <20200316165055.31179-7-broonie@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200316165055.31179-1-broonie@kernel.org>
References: <20200316165055.31179-1-broonie@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>

The current code to print PSTATE symbolically when generating
backtraces etc., does not include the BYTPE field used by Branch
Target Identification.

So, decode BYTPE and print it too.

In the interests of human-readability, print the classes of BTI
matched.  The symbolic notation, BYTPE (PSTATE[11:10]) and
permitted classes of subsequent instruction are:

    -- (BTYPE=0b00): any insn
    jc (BTYPE=0b01): BTI jc, BTI j, BTI c, PACIxSP
    -c (BYTPE=0b10): BTI jc, BTI c, PACIxSP
    j- (BTYPE=0b11): BTI jc, BTI j

Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
index b8e3faa8d406..24af13d7bde6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
@@ -211,6 +211,15 @@ void machine_restart(char *cmd)
 	while (1);
 }
 
+#define bstr(suffix, str) [PSR_BTYPE_ ## suffix >> PSR_BTYPE_SHIFT] = str
+static const char *const btypes[] = {
+	bstr(NONE, "--"),
+	bstr(  JC, "jc"),
+	bstr(   C, "-c"),
+	bstr(  J , "j-")
+};
+#undef bstr
+
 static void print_pstate(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	u64 pstate = regs->pstate;
@@ -229,7 +238,10 @@ static void print_pstate(struct pt_regs *regs)
 			pstate & PSR_AA32_I_BIT ? 'I' : 'i',
 			pstate & PSR_AA32_F_BIT ? 'F' : 'f');
 	} else {
-		printk("pstate: %08llx (%c%c%c%c %c%c%c%c %cPAN %cUAO)\n",
+		const char *btype_str = btypes[(pstate & PSR_BTYPE_MASK) >>
+					       PSR_BTYPE_SHIFT];
+
+		printk("pstate: %08llx (%c%c%c%c %c%c%c%c %cPAN %cUAO BTYPE=%s)\n",
 			pstate,
 			pstate & PSR_N_BIT ? 'N' : 'n',
 			pstate & PSR_Z_BIT ? 'Z' : 'z',
@@ -240,7 +252,8 @@ static void print_pstate(struct pt_regs *regs)
 			pstate & PSR_I_BIT ? 'I' : 'i',
 			pstate & PSR_F_BIT ? 'F' : 'f',
 			pstate & PSR_PAN_BIT ? '+' : '-',
-			pstate & PSR_UAO_BIT ? '+' : '-');
+			pstate & PSR_UAO_BIT ? '+' : '-',
+			btype_str);
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.20.1