Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
IronPort-SDR: +Dc5zwygM1wkp0rLJA0xqpbWtEwvAHI/d5SWbG8gpU/Xzja9MMCeXtPzYVLP/Uz3yeGewW9vxV
 NNBPjKjFbn6Q==
IronPort-SDR: AIMDdKRJtMZydTFlW4tt9zT6zaAKwOMzVPMm2h5MaPSCZKm4+n+PU9YNAwbg2et54nQCTOpvaI
 4G2Q/NqGsB+Q==
Message-ID: <11e9de481f37a5160fe0d82dcbd7beb9d100748d.camel@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v28 21/22] x86/vdso: Implement a vDSO for Intel SGX
 enclave call
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To:     Nathaniel McCallum <npmccallum@redhat.com>,
        Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        dave.hansen@intel.com,
        "Christopherson, Sean J" <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
        Neil Horman <nhorman@redhat.com>,
        "Huang, Haitao" <haitao.huang@intel.com>,
        andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
        "Svahn, Kai" <kai.svahn@intel.com>, bp@alien8.de,
        Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>, luto@kernel.org,
        kai.huang@intel.com, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
        cedric.xing@intel.com, Patrick Uiterwijk <puiterwijk@redhat.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        Connor Kuehl <ckuehl@redhat.com>,
        Harald Hoyer <harald@redhat.com>,
        Lily Sturmann <lsturman@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 16 Mar 2020 23:29:51 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20d3cc40d559a854a7984543acdacb61a2d51b8d.camel@linux.intel.com>
References: <20200303233609.713348-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
         <20200303233609.713348-22-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
         <CAOASepPi4byhQ21hngsSx8tosCC-xa=y6r4j=pWo2MZGeyhi4Q@mail.gmail.com>
         <20200315012523.GC208715@linux.intel.com>
         <CAOASepP9GeTEqs1DSfPiSm9ER0whj9qwSc46ZiNj_K4dMekOfQ@mail.gmail.com>
         <7f9f2efe-e9af-44da-6719-040600f5b351@fortanix.com>
         <CAOASepNifZdBmg59sJcP1mqSYMW_C=KsdKq-fCmvAU_5iQ9DFw@mail.gmail.com>
         <20d3cc40d559a854a7984543acdacb61a2d51b8d.camel@linux.intel.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.35.92-1 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 2020-03-16 at 23:27 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-03-16 at 09:57 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > For the vDSO, only marginally. I'm counting +4,-2 instructions in my
> > suggestions. For the wrapper, things become significantly simpler.
> 
> Simpler is not a quality that has very high importance here except
> when it comes to vDSO.
> 
> At least it is not enough to change to vDSO. What else?
                                      ~~
                                      the

In any case, where I stand is that the vDSO implementation itself is
exactly how it should be. The process to get it to this form was
tedious. Now we have a form that the known userbase can live with.

The documentation sucks, agreed. I think by fixing that this would
be a wholelot better.

/Jarkko