Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932224AbWBSTSK (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:18:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932228AbWBSTSJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:18:09 -0500 Received: from ms-smtp-03-smtplb.tampabay.rr.com ([65.32.5.133]:21745 "EHLO ms-smtp-03.tampabay.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932224AbWBSTSI (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:18:08 -0500 Message-ID: <43F8C464.3000509@cfl.rr.com> Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:17:56 -0500 From: Phillip Susi User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060119) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Stern CC: Pavel Machek , Kyle Moffett , Alon Bar-Lev , Kernel development list Subject: Re: Flames over -- Re: Which is simpler? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1077 Lines: 25 Alan Stern wrote: > > I'm confused. Weren't you arguing, only a few days ago, that it _should_ > be okay to unplug a USB drive while the system is suspended? After all, No, I wasn't arguing that it should be okay to unplug a usb drive while the system is suspended, I was saying that it is better for the kernel to assume you did not when it can't really tell, since you aren't supposed to do that anyhow. > since there's no difference (as far as the kernel can see) between power > loss on the bus and an actual unplug, you can hardly say that one should > be allowed and the other not. But there _IS_ a difference between power loss and actual unplug, so I very well can say one is allowed and the other is not. The fact that the kernel can not tell the difference is simply a limitation that must be dealt with. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/