Received: by 2002:a25:e7d8:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e207csp3363211ybh; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 21:56:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vuevNu69vQjFMWDNMOkxyPNXvmEgM0YBLrpkoP2ODmiJhv6dNy/c/rOlx/F0nJ3khsz9LPo X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6446:: with SMTP id m6mr2140107otl.122.1584420978058; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 21:56:18 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1584420978; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=JI3pxoY3mXifQkGCGGFdte1IP1KFBQnp1nYkKWfpKq2MC6XmGOYpkGwPx/ydZyEPJ3 7MOxxL/w7GzSNYlUdPfw2a+5p7rGLWVWHa94eEvUt7vGZ3cPbJkEacGatO4Tmy5ufiW6 Z9294NMemGAEnkkClMPhpOXmqm5JO2d+yDts3IbibrcD954MO08ydRtfde7XcMIP2irS 9ZQbGhKcDnjuNZi7jslcx7NOv0msr2tUJmPo3MiIJ+hogm+B+Ekt+jxOTg2tCkI+yHCS C8VEPeKdoAnLYSOh34Gb1mUwAce1qBFQ+SHoDzP10r54D6T8zTXvJXXtO/oXTCRmRULb au2A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=6LqbjpYd53Jp9kp/0aPiSSghdNoCLRiq2Rd7QnWjLIc=; b=iC/leafaFsHYXTdv227KYIePvhsLQ0iH2ghi4onUJ9JFb9ycRNFM+O/G278ZBg+ORY qCQKiASGmaITIfSgWmxl0Kq/voGjenpki+tGKLNp95kKhMIw+tDUzyGNdbCid3WGHLIP 5H6ewlz3XvAHz8gJmX6hO1mFlTphrdr0BJEvrOs70xsSeaYX1E9IO7SiX9c2mnTWTLXw EczUgjAHwgBAfTF1SI92aZhwVThnepQjedxAI/WRNX327sTTmXNolS7UKwkSZJvDSjhs XiOVVL4oC6LdhmUav2V+91tmK/5xMDc1uaYKgpHPnB/d1qBGwzDN+cnGhBHgVtLkZKuG /0iQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=iVHUd3yw; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a64si1153719oif.256.2020.03.16.21.56.06; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 21:56:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=iVHUd3yw; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726679AbgCQEhJ (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 17 Mar 2020 00:37:09 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f194.google.com ([209.85.215.194]:38037 "EHLO mail-pg1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726637AbgCQEhJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2020 00:37:09 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f194.google.com with SMTP id x7so11006897pgh.5 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 21:37:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=6LqbjpYd53Jp9kp/0aPiSSghdNoCLRiq2Rd7QnWjLIc=; b=iVHUd3ywdaBlLYso7oVZ0XswpPkdLkJ/oUySME3/MTNKnNSuwcGayhEKjvHxQqmT99 PteQgFyxpfR2zAtrvFt0HA6L4doFJsRSoG86ZNZCHMZEWGRdL2eeOjBmbNAZJy++zE+j +tp9ekAHdZm/thBTPpFkKBTEPYFsAHuToGKbfDG5fE9MoZzuxwEHNUc5jbSc2HPZZChq 92NvxixLSBvVm8kVBa0UGLOnqTCXJGdfRywFZD8ln5nPCHm58Kg1dOoM2fWvgnDn6oOk /Nlllcz9KFMZ4VxTIeFs2kFEkzP9mAHfEZs/Iu3HLwL1f5K+sLfEZN6Ot4Gi7b525T/J Qspg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=6LqbjpYd53Jp9kp/0aPiSSghdNoCLRiq2Rd7QnWjLIc=; b=Pxptn2w00/8HAaYGu66E2aGYaLJ6nKbWSt+rNON63+2yZvnrkjw8QM5WHXKGGCnVY/ zWx0UQ57KGYGAiTyVo8DBPk9Tf1w8rzrm/v/CaKv1KzeSoAo+Cfo8B8ZNfr/0euqS5Kn PAx2mDe+PpAKEPN+nD419b0UIQHNGn5ucXPP2hWet0PGlLF7I8vlCjHNMEYLps+PnzCi aM0BfDzU+WPedJUK+W0+nKWOxIRPSlstPrbh+Cl1Fd0riKmObmc39xI7KhVCTCj+QBFM 1Uc5Z+yDQLB5LBoXhv2bITbqhhWZqBlXVvYbxOUj2n18e3eMQOtTETJXIBsJ50DbtLDV 2EoA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2WqV5ZlNAQYkt3V2hkg4yftmlR9Xl0LYTaXbZ7q3JllrE1DshB IyHeeO+0UV5xgwNLH1VCIZc= X-Received: by 2002:a62:e40b:: with SMTP id r11mr3216028pfh.137.1584419826053; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 21:37:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([106.51.232.35]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id kb18sm1309929pjb.14.2020.03.16.21.37.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 16 Mar 2020 21:37:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 10:07:02 +0530 From: afzal mohammed To: Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , soc@kernel.org, arm@kernel.org Cc: Tony Lindgren , Alexander Sverdlin , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Ha=C5=82asa?= , Viresh Kumar , Lubomir Rintel , Gregory CLEMENT , Hartley Sweeten , Viresh Kumar , Shiraz Hashim , Andrew Lunn , Jason Cooper , Sebastian Hesselbarth , Russell King , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: replace setup_irq() by request_irq() Message-ID: <20200317043702.GA5852@afzalpc> References: <87mu8ppknv.fsf@FE-laptop> <20200302031736.5or4ww5a4l7zomfo@vireshk-i7> <20200308161903.GA156645@furthur.local> <20200301122226.4068-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com> <51cebbbb-3ba4-b336-82a9-abcc22f9a69c@gmail.com> <20200304163412.GX37466@atomide.com> <20200313154520.GA5375@afzalpc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200313154520.GA5375@afzalpc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + soc@kernel.org, arm@kernel.org, in case it helps to reduce the chances of below mail getting slipped thr' the cracks. Regards afzal On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 09:15:20PM +0530, afzal mohammed wrote: > Hi Olof, Arnd, > > This is regarding cleanup of setup_irq() usages & replacing it w/ > request_irq(). Earlier it was sent as single series spanning all > architectures & drivers, later Thomas Gleixner suggested [1] to take it > thr' relevant maintainers. As for ARM, there is an additional layer of > sub-architecture maintainers, for ARM, patches were sent to relevant > subsystem maintainers & mailing list, all copied to LAKML as well. > > There were 10 sub-arch's in ARM that were subjected to the cleanup, > > 1. OMAP :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301121945.3604-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com > 2. ebsa110 :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301122210.4013-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com > 3. rpc :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301122300.4185-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com > 4. footbridge :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301122131.3902-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com > 5. orion :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301122330.4296-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com > 6. ep93xx :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301122112.3847-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com > 7. spear :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301122315.4240-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com > 8. cns3xxx :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301122155.3957-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com > 9. mmp :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301122243.4129-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com > 10. iop32x :https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200301122226.4068-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com > > Of this, > > (1) OMAP, (2) ebsa110 & (3) rpc are already in linux-next. > > (4) footbridge (Russell) - there was a build warning, so he dropped > after applying to his tree, i have submitted the newer fixed version in > his patch system. > > (5) orion - Andrew has given Reviewed-by & Gregory mentioned that he will > take care of it. > > So if things goes as expected 1 & 5 will be coming to you thr' sub-arch > maintainers, while 2-4 directly via Russell > > Now we are left with five (6-10), > (6) ep93xx - Alexander has given Acked-by & mentioned to take thr' Arnd > (7) spear - Viresh has given Acked-by & mentioned to take it thr' Arnd > (8) cns3xxx - Krzysztof has given Acked-by (though not copied to lists, > he has been cc'ed here) > (9) mmp - Lubomir has given Acked-by & Tested-by & mentioned to get it > thr' Olof > (10) iop32xx - per get_mantainer, an orphan > > Can you please include the patches 6-10 directly into the armsoc tree ?, > Let me know if anything needs to be done from my side. > > Regards > afzal > > [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87y2somido.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de