Received: by 2002:a25:e7d8:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e207csp3439560ybh; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 23:43:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vu5RZLbFXs8jYtq1hXgX/G3kL+GqDUkJ7S/fYtVqZ2J3U1PkTOHh8BBXJPlH/TUg4rQRK2c X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:104:: with SMTP id i4mr2579031otp.346.1584427392598; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 23:43:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1584427392; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=MHhtmGAWluBaCdFP/VwejTZ5xtMwbENO/B3RlMReQ++jkcpb0ar++vXZIk9YQPha/U xodvDQwgFPeJ80CVUaYCpoJktJmtbyooNyDkLnFbY4bwIuhvrKHtupmAY/bx/0gRquDP CRtLuW4XopAIl4KN6Uy6lzc+aO48XPUDyCny/AMPkiWKENrudacuk6S81usehumRr7T5 LR2pCpSqiKjmzTwfrCZlJItT5XKmQ1cDp09DOG8cctF1Z86QDzXeQFH1nf4yxOSKs/T9 g5afk+SHGLTvAJtFaKa981ihofkR0khx0vd5sA6gRqyHycFrTpjbBu5/mroMoZoyfny2 /RzQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=QzMdezse86O1I46QPSYnGoJ2WKq+MDMwT/JXRNdRzWM=; b=kUU/O0iQZU91OE7HWT7XGSr7rxwBCfg1R1VR2IDHhdQym8duXPYT2DsZNGHQpdU+f+ 2/ZC0NdYz9k6jQBs14bQw+CDRvQis6+AG0oiqcXW2l1DP+c2bNE2JoW5bpa34waizSDY NhzWmU2ncerWNRL87VE6H/z/R8bqSBOvajOo4btF+eelDapmmHJWQVWd/0laOuMUnq54 V9Q3njZF5gaJCOEjiI8pySfe5j6sua5ZKBw+Y+inxxmPqGyJa2D9DenYPgbUEYmAB7kd VYVy4lsnAq505/EL2gGoeyO+7o4U8+iORmx0rVa+dwbVg6F4Q2hVMuCwQIgE13VkRmg0 pbTg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x26si1317307otp.61.2020.03.16.23.42.58; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 23:43:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725868AbgCQGl7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 17 Mar 2020 02:41:59 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:32872 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725536AbgCQGl7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2020 02:41:59 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C89881FB; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 23:41:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e107533-lin.cambridge.arm.com (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A38003F52E; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 23:45:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 06:41:52 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla To: Jeffy Chen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, anders.roxell@linaro.org, arnd@arndb.de, sboyd@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, naresh.kamboju@linaro.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, Basil.Eljuse@arm.com, mturquette@baylibre.com, Sudeep Holla , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arch_topology: Fix putting invalid cpu clk Message-ID: <20200317064152.GB12791@e107533-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20200317063308.23209-1-jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20200317063308.23209-1-jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 02:33:08PM +0800, Jeffy Chen wrote: > Add a sanity check before putting the cpu clk. > > Fixes: b8fe128dad8f (“arch_topology: Adjust initial CPU capacities with current freq") Interesting, I had NACKed the original patch in v1 IIRC. I was against for adding clk into arch topology as not all platform control CPUFreq via clk APIs. Anyways, as fix this makes sense, but I need to take a look and find ways to remove it if possible, but that's for some other time. -- Regards, Sudeep