Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751169AbWBTAx6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Feb 2006 19:53:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932487AbWBTAx6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Feb 2006 19:53:58 -0500 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:13797 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751167AbWBTAx5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Feb 2006 19:53:57 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 01:53:33 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Nigel Cunningham Cc: Matthias Hensler , Sebastian Kgler , kernel list , rjw@sisk.pl Subject: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Message-ID: <20060220005333.GL15608@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20060201113710.6320.68289.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <200602200709.17955.nigel@suspend2.net> <20060219212952.GI15311@elf.ucw.cz> <200602201025.01823.nigel@suspend2.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200602201025.01823.nigel@suspend2.net> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3284 Lines: 74 Hi! > > > It is a lot slower because it does all it's I/O synchronously, doesn't > > > compress the image and throws away memory until at least half is > > > free. > > > > uswsusp does compress image (20% speedup, in recent CVS) and do > > asynchronous I/O. > > Only 20? You must be doing something horribly wrong. Asynchronous 20% is speedup for compression alone, over whole suspend process. Device suspend/resume takes lot of time in recent kernels. > > > > > The only con I see is the complexity of the code, but then again, > > > > > Nigel > > > > > > > > ..but thats a big con. > > > > > > It's fud. Hopefully as I post more suspend2 patches to LKML, people will > > > see that Suspend2 is simpler than what you are planning. > > > > For what I'm planning, all the neccessary patches are already in -mm > > tree. And they are *really* simple. If you can get suspend2 to 1000 > > lines of code (like Rafael did with uswsusp), we can have something to > > talk about. > > Turn it round the right way. If you can get the functionality of Suspend2 > using userspace only, then we have something to talk about. Only feature I can't do is "save whole pagecache"... and 14000 lines of code for _that_ is a bit too much. I could probably patch my kernel to dump pagecache to userspace, but I do not think it is worth the effort. > > > Let's be clear. uswsusp is not really moving suspend-to-disk to > > > userspace. What it is doing is leaving everything but some code for > > > writing the image in kernel space, and implementing ioctls to give a > > > userspace program the ability to request that other processes be frozen, > > > the snapshot prepared and so on. Pages in the snapshot are copied to > > > userspace, possibly compressed or encrypted there in future, then fed > > > back to kernel space so it can use the swap routines to do the writing. > > > Very little of substance is being done in userspace. In short, all it's > > > doing is adding the complexity of > > > > Maybe very little of substance is being done in userspace, but all the > > uglyness can stay there. I no longer need LZF in kernel, special > > netlink API for progress bar (progress bar naturally lives in > > userland), no plugin infrastructure needed, etc. > > And you do need?... I do not need anything more than what is already in -mm tree. > > If you can do suspend2 without putting stuff listed above into kernel, > > and in acceptable ammount of code... we can see. But you should really > > put suspend2 code into userspace, and be done with that. Feel free to > > spam l-k a bit more, but using existing infrastructure in -mm is right > > way to go, and it is easier, too. > > It is only easier because you're not comparing apples with apples. I have no > desire to spam LKML with this pointless discussion, so I'm just going to get > on with submitting patches for review. So please take my comments from "suspend2 review" mail into account. Pavel -- Web maintainer for suspend.sf.net (www.sf.net/projects/suspend) wanted... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/