Received: by 2002:a25:e7d8:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e207csp4277493ybh; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 15:58:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsUW5OMhIS07N/0Mid+lVRPZntC7iAZp3wzxJ6zvRIsd0eqq3ogJXeeUjol9lquyqSVmemr X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:2246:: with SMTP id t6mr1481485otd.46.1584485879929; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 15:57:59 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1584485879; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CjvaFBGKXInhyKUWsTUtBTqoAWP9mfysmssinBvY7FRtSpoHb1mUESSL7cY5UzfxEj aEJNYgo8XGbEMYHBOqTA549ZI3t45wuYupwR7yWxJAxZqVUwBXkbKAH7BldGUN9UrTEe sOAYu0i5XBmgAhZb1jxU3XAUnk5q9ZB62PRY1iFwfQUCIWjyZsZXW81iDBPefCiqu6nD wuIFw+VhI4H6pG5mHmByc8yFY4rKgQbw3s+JyUFiTd9Mx96roEW2OoEtuAMIMJI64qrP wpI20fDo+ADgEIJZd/8Cto0R6LVDJK+aKy9SdTOSw4HTwCo9Wlj/BqOylUaOOzuPoczL mOLg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=qPjpELHrrEnupb+1Qffvq9ofEilK9vMdjFW0bdmj9vE=; b=ZCSQ5FetUjyU9D8eE+BDXLKvIpPDWURm9LF9XGz96CiFJ7x2EEZyO55OIMNVAOwX4H jyTzCxIUrTYYFybcrjLAWMs4JOj1UgMrBHHMuv6YLQVxNDeKdJ85YMwGuAZRF/CtQ1fU qQPNruo2+UrQ2mUsQu5eAw4mypejawAfX2NeUJEJpitQ8WlgkYoSgOhQtRYEpFar8qe2 UYve4fWLAdPrHVDsK4Bd4ruR/rL59DIvQCPPE31Qfdc8+aojrQWScHYuV706bFGUCWk6 ka5nmn6TL7njDAo0V8F6MEju45TJ52gvxZQolKfgY+pBP8jgPuiIlvxN+kmkhCQawV2O FzTg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@ideasonboard.com header.s=mail header.b=rnTSNTlU; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t125si2200052oie.167.2020.03.17.15.57.22; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 15:57:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@ideasonboard.com header.s=mail header.b=rnTSNTlU; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726871AbgCQW5E (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 17 Mar 2020 18:57:04 -0400 Received: from perceval.ideasonboard.com ([213.167.242.64]:59434 "EHLO perceval.ideasonboard.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726476AbgCQW5E (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2020 18:57:04 -0400 Received: from pendragon.ideasonboard.com (81-175-216-236.bb.dnainternet.fi [81.175.216.236]) by perceval.ideasonboard.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 02333F9; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 23:57:01 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ideasonboard.com; s=mail; t=1584485822; bh=LkGALHj3ZbXtSeBxaDQ/2X+mEFinyF7ObC7hBw1Ives=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=rnTSNTlUYdXRicamiaFRw+BvmOlabFDpWfrQfE51i7c3B8LsxmLase1kq9CXypUEW wp7KuJpbaYS1QKPkZyKOMc4ElMrSGR9rr8KNJAo+gf/I7idaoSjEOd22PMHjGib/B9 ObH4Lf3m7tL7pGQLm9bS0uKmfL7KWqZtcf0eKTkE= Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 00:56:56 +0200 From: Laurent Pinchart To: Oleksandr Suvorov Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Paul Barker , Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= , Marcel Ziswiler , Igor Opaniuk , Philippe Schenker , Rob Herring , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/7] dt-bindings: pwm: add normal PWM polarity flag Message-ID: <20200317225656.GK2527@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> References: <20200317123231.2843297-1-oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com> <20200317123231.2843297-4-oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200317123231.2843297-4-oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Oleksandr, Thank you for the patch. On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 02:32:27PM +0200, Oleksandr Suvorov wrote: > PWM can have a normal polarity and a reverted one. The reverted polarity > value is defined. As mentioned by Paul, I'd use "inverted" instead of "reverted". Your patch series is trying to standardized on "inverted", let's not add another term :-) I would squash this patch with 2/7, apart from that it looks fine. However, I also agree with Thierry that the PWM cell that contains this value is a bitmask, so once we get more flags it may get a bit awkward. Will we have one macro for each flag that will evaluate to 0 to report that the flag isn't set ? Or should we define a single PWM_FLAG_NONE (or similarly named) macro ? In retrospect, maybe PWM_POLARITY_INVERTED should have been named PWM_FLAG_POLARITY_INVERTED. > Define the PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL to be used further. > > Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Suvorov > --- > > include/dt-bindings/pwm/pwm.h | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/pwm/pwm.h b/include/dt-bindings/pwm/pwm.h > index ab9a077e3c7d..6b58caa6385e 100644 > --- a/include/dt-bindings/pwm/pwm.h > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/pwm/pwm.h > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ > #ifndef _DT_BINDINGS_PWM_PWM_H > #define _DT_BINDINGS_PWM_PWM_H > > +#define PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL 0 > #define PWM_POLARITY_INVERTED (1 << 0) > > #endif -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart