Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932438AbWBTKCq (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 05:02:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932467AbWBTKCp (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 05:02:45 -0500 Received: from mustang.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.3]:37267 "HELO mustang.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932438AbWBTKCp (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 05:02:45 -0500 Subject: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) From: Lee Revell To: Matthias Hensler Cc: Pavel Machek , Sebastian Kgler , kernel list , nigel@suspend2.net, rjw@sisk.pl In-Reply-To: <20060220093911.GB19293@kobayashi-maru.wspse.de> References: <20060201113710.6320.68289.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <200602091926.38666.nigel@suspend2.net> <20060209232453.GC3389@elf.ucw.cz> <200602110116.57639.sebas@kde.org> <20060211104130.GA28282@kobayashi-maru.wspse.de> <20060218142610.GT3490@openzaurus.ucw.cz> <20060220093911.GB19293@kobayashi-maru.wspse.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 05:02:38 -0500 Message-Id: <1140429758.3429.1.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.5.91 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 650 Lines: 19 On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 10:39 +0100, Matthias Hensler wrote: > > It is slightly slower, > > Sorry, but that is just unacceptable. Um... suspend2 puts extra tests into really hot paths like fork(), which is equally unacceptable to many people. Why can't people understand that arguing "it works" without any consideration of possible performance tradeoffs is not a good enough argument for merging? Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/