Subject: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10]
	[Suspend2] Modules support.)
From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Matthias Hensler <matthias@wspse.de>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>, Sebastian Kgler <sebas@kde.org>,
       kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, nigel@suspend2.net,
       rjw@sisk.pl
In-Reply-To: <20060220101018.GA21817@kobayashi-maru.wspse.de>
References: <20060201113710.6320.68289.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
	 <200602091926.38666.nigel@suspend2.net> <20060209232453.GC3389@elf.ucw.cz>
	 <200602110116.57639.sebas@kde.org>
	 <20060211104130.GA28282@kobayashi-maru.wspse.de>
	 <20060218142610.GT3490@openzaurus.ucw.cz>
	 <20060220093911.GB19293@kobayashi-maru.wspse.de>
	 <1140429758.3429.1.camel@mindpipe>
	 <20060220101018.GA21817@kobayashi-maru.wspse.de>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 05:15:28 -0500
Message-Id: <1140430528.3429.11.camel@mindpipe>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 854
Lines: 20

On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 11:10 +0100, Matthias Hensler wrote:
> > Why can't people understand that arguing "it works" without any
> > consideration of possible performance tradeoffs is not a good enough
> > argument for merging?
> 
> It sure isn't the argument, you are right. My main concern here is to
> throw away a working implementation and starting over from the scratch,
> instead of solving these problems.

Take it up with the author for not working more closely with the kernel
developers while Suspend2 was being developed, AFAICT a LOT of this
could have been avoided with better communication.

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/