Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964839AbWBTKYm (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 05:24:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964842AbWBTKYm (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 05:24:42 -0500 Received: from canadatux.org ([81.169.162.242]:25061 "EHLO zoidberg.canadatux.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964839AbWBTKYk (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 05:24:40 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 11:24:34 +0100 From: Matthias Hensler To: Lee Revell Cc: Pavel Machek , Sebastian Kgler , kernel list , nigel@suspend2.net, rjw@sisk.pl Subject: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Message-ID: <20060220102434.GD21817@kobayashi-maru.wspse.de> Reply-To: Matthias Hensler References: <20060201113710.6320.68289.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <200602091926.38666.nigel@suspend2.net> <20060209232453.GC3389@elf.ucw.cz> <200602110116.57639.sebas@kde.org> <20060211104130.GA28282@kobayashi-maru.wspse.de> <20060218142610.GT3490@openzaurus.ucw.cz> <20060220093911.GB19293@kobayashi-maru.wspse.de> <1140429758.3429.1.camel@mindpipe> <20060220101018.GA21817@kobayashi-maru.wspse.de> <1140430528.3429.11.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1140430528.3429.11.camel@mindpipe> Organization: WSPse (http://www.wspse.de/) X-Gummibears: Bouncing here and there and everywhere X-Face: &Tv]9SsNpb/$w8\G-O%>W02aApFW^P>[x+Upv9xQB!2;iD9Y1-Lz'qlc{+lL2Y>J(u76Jk,cJ@$tP2-M%y?^'jn2J]3C'ss_~"u?kA^X&{]h?O?@*VwgSGob73I9r}&S%ktup0k2!neScg3'HO}PU#Ac>jwNL|P@f|f*sz*cP'hi)/a=6.rc-P1vXarjVXlzClmNfcSy/$4tQz User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1192 Lines: 27 Hi. On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 05:15:28AM -0500, Lee Revell wrote: > On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 11:10 +0100, Matthias Hensler wrote: > > It sure isn't the argument, you are right. My main concern here is > > to throw away a working implementation and starting over from the > > scratch, instead of solving these problems. > > Take it up with the author for not working more closely with the > kernel developers while Suspend2 was being developed, AFAICT a LOT of > this could have been avoided with better communication. I think Nigel already said that this went wrong, agreed. However, I remember that this was discussed a lot earlier and Suspend 2 was just not acceptable for the mainline, so work was done to get it acceptable. But however, that is really not the point. I would like to go on and solve the issues with the current problems, and not to start from the beginning just because of mistakes that were made in the past. Regards, Matthias - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/