Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932499AbWBTLSE (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 06:18:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932505AbWBTLSB (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 06:18:01 -0500 Received: from canadatux.org ([81.169.162.242]:52683 "EHLO zoidberg.canadatux.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932499AbWBTLSA (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 06:18:00 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 12:17:56 +0100 From: Matthias Hensler To: Pavel Machek Cc: Nigel Cunningham , Sebastian Kgler , kernel list , rjw@sisk.pl Subject: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Message-ID: <20060220111756.GC22552@kobayashi-maru.wspse.de> Reply-To: Matthias Hensler References: <20060201113710.6320.68289.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <200602200709.17955.nigel@suspend2.net> <20060219212952.GI15311@elf.ucw.cz> <200602201025.01823.nigel@suspend2.net> <20060220005333.GL15608@elf.ucw.cz> <20060220094728.GD19293@kobayashi-maru.wspse.de> <20060220105617.GF16042@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060220105617.GF16042@elf.ucw.cz> Organization: WSPse (http://www.wspse.de/) X-Gummibears: Bouncing here and there and everywhere X-Face: &Tv]9SsNpb/$w8\G-O%>W02aApFW^P>[x+Upv9xQB!2;iD9Y1-Lz'qlc{+lL2Y>J(u76Jk,cJ@$tP2-M%y?^'jn2J]3C'ss_~"u?kA^X&{]h?O?@*VwgSGob73I9r}&S%ktup0k2!neScg3'HO}PU#Ac>jwNL|P@f|f*sz*cP'hi)/a=6.rc-P1vXarjVXlzClmNfcSy/$4tQz User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 905 Lines: 23 Hi. On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 11:56:17AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Po 20-02-06 10:47:28, Matthias Hensler wrote: > > I do not think that Suspend 2 needs 14000 lines for that, the core > > is much smaller. But besides, _not_ saving the pagecache is a really > > _bad_ idea. I expect to have my system back after resume, in the > > same state I had left it prior to suspend. I really do not like it > > how it is done by Windows, it is just ugly to have a slowly > > responding system after resume, because all caches and buffers are > > gone. > > That's okay, swsusp already saves configurable ammount of pagecache. What about uswsusp? Regards, Matthias - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/