Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030279AbWBTPIj (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 10:08:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030278AbWBTPIi (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 10:08:38 -0500 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.201]:16963 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030279AbWBTPIh convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 10:08:37 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=MDX/aTjYwk6pUlnD2ReY5AOoAUjSeOv4uoYZw6KD2FsjftXO/PO7svE8juJe99dhGZJWsd7WgxwF9H6IQNllMFg4Jk43/ZEqiSGCvoZHa/JysPslF8KRwc3IVqQAKgrJQJqd3hS14ydwTg8BeZPgD5VTbFQ0X04355U0Pm6VYe0= Message-ID: Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 10:08:35 -0500 From: "Dmitry Torokhov" Reply-To: dtor_core@ameritech.net To: "Pavel Machek" Subject: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Cc: "Mark Lord" , "Nigel Cunningham" , "Lee Revell" , "Matthias Hensler" , "Sebastian Kgler" , "kernel list" , rjw@sisk.pl In-Reply-To: <20060220145405.GD1673@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060201113710.6320.68289.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20060220103329.GE21817@kobayashi-maru.wspse.de> <1140434146.3429.17.camel@mindpipe> <200602202124.30560.nigel@suspend2.net> <20060220132333.GB23277@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <43F9D0DC.5080302@rtr.ca> <20060220143041.GB1673@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20060220145405.GD1673@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 710 Lines: 19 On 2/20/06, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > I know I am bad for not reporting that earlier but swsusp was working > > OK for me till about 3 month ago when I started getting "soft lockup > > detected on CPU0" with no useable backtrace 3 times out of 4. I > > somehow suspect that having automounted nfs helps it to fail > > somehow... > > Disable soft lockup watchdog :-). Ok, I will try, but is this the permanent solution you are proposing? -- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/