Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161008AbWBTQaP (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 11:30:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161009AbWBTQaP (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 11:30:15 -0500 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.201]:28029 "EHLO zproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161008AbWBTQaN convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 11:30:13 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=KtGUHqMRhFipm+ZO5s/Evwe60fnScAIm0ZDiPQFjDEXy8/oImo1QdCAElZzCyyIM68sDTErBbTxRBdRo+4RpOIgY9oxOzyJnDJANk5sbksmsN1jvbl+uwTZQIscTsbTxch7zbDwtfna+B0eO2NbYySzPwqrsJsyS/MYFgmRiGWI= Message-ID: Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 11:30:12 -0500 From: "Dmitry Torokhov" Reply-To: dtor_core@ameritech.net To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Cc: "Pavel Machek" , "Mark Lord" , "Nigel Cunningham" , "Lee Revell" , "Matthias Hensler" , "Sebastian Kgler" , "kernel list" In-Reply-To: <200602201722.09442.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060201113710.6320.68289.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20060220145405.GD1673@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <200602201722.09442.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1446 Lines: 38 On 2/20/06, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday 20 February 2006 16:08, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On 2/20/06, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > > > > I know I am bad for not reporting that earlier but swsusp was working > > > > OK for me till about 3 month ago when I started getting "soft lockup > > > > detected on CPU0" with no useable backtrace 3 times out of 4. I > > > > somehow suspect that having automounted nfs helps it to fail > > > > somehow... > > > > > > Disable soft lockup watchdog :-). > > > > Ok, I will try, but is this the permanent solution you are proposing? > > Certainly not. > > The problem is the soft lockup watchdog tends to produce false-positives > related to the clock resume vs timer interrupt dependencies that are > hard to trace. > > I used to get those on a regular basis until the timer resume on x86-64 > got fixed a month ago or so. > > Please try the latest -mm and see if it's not fixed there. If not, please > file a bug report with bugzilla (with Cc to me). > Latest -mm is way too big a target. Do you have a specific patches in mind? Again my working kernel is based off tip of Linus's tree plus my patches, not -mm. -- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/