Received: by 2002:a25:d783:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o125csp431054ybg; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 02:22:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vv+Vp0jMWqa9QBQ+JfG3+Wklb+FbGvt+MiJ0PHaVmvKjoFDOWgnzjQOyq7uzUz7KvU76Cg+ X-Received: by 2002:a9d:67d9:: with SMTP id c25mr1467553otn.358.1584609765454; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 02:22:45 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1584609765; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=YESjzisZtBHopHCJlLrQU39RyLGXg6zYwMYSru97DOR8LznJHmq/ODOJRVx59BNvx8 IZVt02jOD7Jl16ajrQgT+DhQXUSaDcO5aXJTHWiMEkULJGc8Lt+pej7Nvhv+VRhe1YEz Nun5lUVS0BbYgWQR1otZUBzOHkUQ5Z02iZOBq1akCfxdrBV6ukVqlU1DTBmUwIbddeT4 7CduRQY7SlT0Ij1qC00yQd09DrtnLyysEPRiTolW/PkzBR8g/6lGdEKz/s7WzWrQW4Ew KXZEc6i6byxg7JDv/DBfKcJs93hoBoiPBXbrAPceMeRbY1QtQyF3vh0wn/Gdoqg+88Ac gpig== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=6kneWBh2GYFk5mITvtVwfX0Cr42ctmnaJGe2weJ1iMU=; b=Z6EEmotWFOujAx3OtWBahOndKkFN4PubBMJbkc5K4rhFIwk4ImIH8CeHRT91CI8r3N G9xMvDC/fOm+PBOf9HaLxMCcxYRUNkoUdKH0YXvLNUAqd5+VfPlzKabtRkjNxW+iQcIG LNgubZaZNsB4B3Qtz/7160VRBDLl4jO3ucefPAZMP1Q9XozP3O/NoePozA16wJ+t9KG1 RevMJZnXbeSKX74+6AjSEAuc9qSPQs/QAmVLhyZH6NeE7RQwe6lSCBNdTlteh9tcuRcM eFzy04Bq7iTFAfBDhZ+jccScnvW8NlTKAceQm6gNP2JFpfzBhkIH6VoDfo3Fa7QLKsPB cRYA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l13si742885oib.268.2020.03.19.02.22.33; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 02:22:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727064AbgCSJWR (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 19 Mar 2020 05:22:17 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:50068 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726968AbgCSJWR (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2020 05:22:17 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2697EAE59; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 09:22:15 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 02:21:07 -0700 From: Davidlohr Bueso To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: LKML , Peter Zijlstra , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Will Deacon , "Paul E . McKenney" , Joel Fernandes , Steven Rostedt , Randy Dunlap , Michael Ellerman , Arnd Bergmann , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Logan Gunthorpe , Kurt Schwemmer , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Felipe Balbi , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Kalle Valo , "David S. Miller" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov Subject: Re: [patch V2 07/15] powerpc/ps3: Convert half completion to rcuwait Message-ID: <20200319092107.6brm26peh3h2n4sk@linux-p48b> References: <20200318204302.693307984@linutronix.de> <20200318204408.102694393@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200318204408.102694393@linutronix.de> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 18 Mar 2020, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >AFAICT the kthread uses TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE to not increase loadavg, kthreads >cannot receive signals by default and this one doesn't look different. Use >TASK_IDLE instead. Hmm it seems in general this needs to be done kernel-wide. This kthread abuse of TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE seems to be a common thing. There's also the users doing schedule_timeout_interruptible()... Thanks, Davidlohr