Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org,
        Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.5 28/65] mac80211: rx: avoid RCU list traversal under mutex
Date:   Thu, 19 Mar 2020 14:04:10 +0100
Message-Id: <20200319123935.249074287@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200319123926.466988514@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20200319123926.466988514@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.66
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

From: Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com>

[ Upstream commit 253216ffb2a002a682c6f68bd3adff5b98b71de8 ]

local->sta_mtx is held in __ieee80211_check_fast_rx_iface().
No need to use list_for_each_entry_rcu() as it also requires
a cond argument to avoid false lockdep warnings when not used in
RCU read-side section (with CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST).
Therefore use list_for_each_entry();

Signed-off-by: Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200223143302.15390-1-madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 net/mac80211/rx.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/mac80211/rx.c b/net/mac80211/rx.c
index 0e05ff0376726..0ba98ad9bc854 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/rx.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/rx.c
@@ -4114,7 +4114,7 @@ void __ieee80211_check_fast_rx_iface(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata)
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&local->sta_mtx);
 
-	list_for_each_entry_rcu(sta, &local->sta_list, list) {
+	list_for_each_entry(sta, &local->sta_list, list) {
 		if (sdata != sta->sdata &&
 		    (!sta->sdata->bss || sta->sdata->bss != sdata->bss))
 			continue;
-- 
2.20.1