Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161081AbWBTSH4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 13:07:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932619AbWBTSH4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 13:07:56 -0500 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.149]:26578 "EHLO e31.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932615AbWBTSHz (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 13:07:55 -0500 Subject: Re: (pspace,pid) vs true pid virtualization From: Dave Hansen To: Kirill Korotaev Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , "Serge E. Hallyn" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vserver@list.linux-vserver.org, Herbert Poetzl , Alan Cox , Arjan van de Ven , Suleiman Souhlal , Hubertus Franke , Cedric Le Goater , Kyle Moffett , Greg , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Greg KH , Rik van Riel , Alexey Kuznetsov , Andrey Savochkin , Kirill Korotaev , Andi Kleen , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Jeff Garzik , Trond Myklebust , Jes Sorensen In-Reply-To: <43F9882C.3060501@sw.ru> References: <20060215145942.GA9274@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> <43F9882C.3060501@sw.ru> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 10:07:49 -0800 Message-Id: <1140458869.10909.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 636 Lines: 15 On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 12:13 +0300, Kirill Korotaev wrote: > > - Should a process have some sort of global (on the machine identifier)? > yep. otherwise it is imposible to manage (ptrace, kill, ...) it, without > introducing new syscalls. Why is introducing syscalls so bad? Does anybody have a list of exactly how many we would need if we added some kind of container argument? -- Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/