Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932409AbWBTSkL (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 13:40:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932622AbWBTSkK (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 13:40:10 -0500 Received: from smtp.enter.net ([216.193.128.24]:58895 "EHLO smtp.enter.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932409AbWBTSkI convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 13:40:08 -0500 From: "D. Hazelton" To: Joerg Schilling Subject: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 13:40:29 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 Cc: matthias.andree@gmx.de, nix@esperi.org.uk, mj@ucw.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davidsen@tmr.com, chris@gnome-de.org, axboe@suse.de References: <787b0d920601241923k5cde2bfcs75b89360b8313b5b@mail.gmail.com> <200602192053.25767.dhazelton@enter.net> <43F9F11E.nail5BM21M01Q@burner> In-Reply-To: <43F9F11E.nail5BM21M01Q@burner> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602201340.30484.dhazelton@enter.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1663 Lines: 36 On Monday 20 February 2006 11:41, Joerg Schilling wrote: > "D. Hazelton" wrote: > > > Part of the problem is J?rg's expecting a solution the day before > > > yesterday. > > > > Well, from some comments he made in private mails he seems to think he > > was promised (by Linus, no less) that the DMA problems in ide-scsi were > > going to be fixed. Instead the module was deprecated and SG_IO was > > introduced - this seems to be one of the things he's been angry about. > > Even you have become a victim of the trolls :-( Never a victim. I stick my nose where I choose - in this case I stuck it in here because I had hoped to turn a discussion I saw descending into a flamewar into something productive. > SG_IO was used in ide-scsi a long time before it was needlessly introduced > on top of /dev/hd* Needlessly? Not true. It was missing from the layer, as all modern ATA devices do support some form of ATAPI, which is, as you've so frequently pointed out, a form of SCSI. So why is an unneeded thing to introduce the ability to use that full capacity? And here I must parrot Martin Mares - you complain about problems when not using ide-scsi but almost all the bugs you've mentioned only occur when using ide-scsi. Now, I'll go and finish replying to all the other mails that have come into my inbox (on this thread) and not been sorted down because they were directly to me. DRH - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/