Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932660AbWBTTqO (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 14:46:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932665AbWBTTqO (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 14:46:14 -0500 Received: from viper.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.4]:27297 "HELO viper.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932663AbWBTTqN (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 14:46:13 -0500 Subject: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) From: Lee Revell To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: dtor_core@ameritech.net, Pavel Machek , Mark Lord , Nigel Cunningham , Matthias Hensler , Sebastian Kgler , kernel list In-Reply-To: <200602201722.09442.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <20060201113710.6320.68289.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20060220145405.GD1673@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <200602201722.09442.rjw@sisk.pl> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 14:46:10 -0500 Message-Id: <1140464770.6722.10.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.5.91 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 653 Lines: 21 On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 17:22 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Certainly not. > > The problem is the soft lockup watchdog tends to produce > false-positives > related to the clock resume vs timer interrupt dependencies that are > hard to trace. > > I used to get those on a regular basis until the timer resume on > x86-64 > got fixed a month ago or so. So it's uncovering bugs, exactly as intended. Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/