Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161125AbWBTUP1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 15:15:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161126AbWBTUP1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 15:15:27 -0500 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.193]:7667 "EHLO zproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161125AbWBTUP0 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 15:15:26 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=E/6BUz64YWLhjsb7mKELrdjRbJmdhW0nGtuasZG7doqKnoZj+/c8AEV5RHNXDzAW6iESmkrI/ZxJnOQRGA15rm2ZNVlKzxh6GXK1IkYd1BXis65ozpt9MBmCgvqTr4vXcYGDq+yA9CiA1lxp76Ov9iCIQ3VSCp2KhXYuojHfeNU= Message-ID: Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 15:15:25 -0500 From: "Dmitry Torokhov" Reply-To: dtor_core@ameritech.net To: "Lee Revell" Subject: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Cc: "Pavel Machek" , "Mark Lord" , "Nigel Cunningham" , "Matthias Hensler" , "Sebastian Kgler" , "kernel list" , rjw@sisk.pl In-Reply-To: <1140464704.6722.8.camel@mindpipe> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060201113710.6320.68289.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20060220103329.GE21817@kobayashi-maru.wspse.de> <1140434146.3429.17.camel@mindpipe> <200602202124.30560.nigel@suspend2.net> <20060220132333.GB23277@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <43F9D0DC.5080302@rtr.ca> <20060220143041.GB1673@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20060220145405.GD1673@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <1140464704.6722.8.camel@mindpipe> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1107 Lines: 26 On 2/20/06, Lee Revell wrote: > On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 15:54 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > I know I am bad for not reporting that earlier but swsusp was > > working > > > OK for me till about 3 month ago when I started getting "soft lockup > > > detected on CPU0" with no useable backtrace 3 times out of 4. I > > > somehow suspect that having automounted nfs helps it to fail > > > somehow... > > > > Disable soft lockup watchdog :-). > > You do know that message is harmless and doesn't actually do anything > right? It's just warning you that the kernel allowed something to hog > the CPU without rescheduling for a LONG time. Well, if that is harmless I am not sure what you'd call harmful ;) because right after this message the box hangs solid and I have to push and hold power button to power it off and start again. -- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/