Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S1161175AbWBTUrs@vger.kernel.org> Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161175AbWBTUrs (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 15:47:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161180AbWBTUrs (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 15:47:48 -0500 Received: from cust8446.nsw01.dataco.com.au ([203.171.93.254]:61326 "EHLO cust8446.nsw01.dataco.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161175AbWBTUrr (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 15:47:47 -0500 From: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@suspend2.net> Organization: Suspend2.net To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Subject: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 06:44:34 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, Sebastian K?gler <sebas@kde.org>, Matthias Hensler <matthias@wspse.de>, rjw@sisk.pl, kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, suspend2-devel@lists.suspend2.net References: <20060201113710.6320.68289.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20060220195155.GB7444@thunk.org> <20060220200807.GB21557@elf.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20060220200807.GB21557@elf.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1301344.YYu0FPb7Nn"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200602210644.38538.nigel@suspend2.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1641 Lines: 50 --nextPart1301344.YYu0FPb7Nn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi. On Tuesday 21 February 2006 06:08, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Maybe you feel you are in a power position because your code happened > > to enter the kernel first, so you few you can have veto power over all > > other contenders. It sometimes works that way, but only up to a > > Unfortunately, I do not need to veto suspend2. It is so complex that > it vetoes itself. Last time akpm stopped it, IIRC. I'm going to let most of the last 8 hours' emails float by without reply, b= ut=20 think I should comment here. I don't believe I've ever seen an email from Andrew stopping a merge, and I= =20 shouldn't have, because I've never asked him to merge it. Being the=20 perfectionist that I am, I've sought to get it as stable, reliable and=20 comment-clean as I reasonably could before merging. Regards, Nigel =2D-=20 See our web page for Howtos, FAQs, the Wiki and mailing list info. http://www.suspend2.net IRC: #suspend2 on Freenode --nextPart1301344.YYu0FPb7Nn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBD+io2N0y+n1M3mo0RApv+AJ0QrDzvWDV26ZJE/o0qeY9B9cCzBQCgtC9X SPGpNiJbHSfi+2nxp8+H7zw= =Ztme -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1301344.YYu0FPb7Nn-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/