Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp269233ybb; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 21:40:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vuYD+eZ6CPrkuYdkEUTT1W3lygUCyQStyCl7uoxDfXRjOweY29frwkxJOEQcIyAG5wgPI8W X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:201a:: with SMTP id e26mr5432118otp.238.1584679249847; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 21:40:49 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1584679249; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=V15uNulb7MAwLa6SGnQy4xrFJGx723upRpsG9oxczKTB7A4n8tTiI1EQmFtdzRD9Xh LTYSk6kCaX10T8hv9c6HfZjUtHW5iSfyE+PW47c5K6MoAzVH46PeDqEYw2tiyGCzmHiV WiSkSpFHSuh1eC+xh16MeLIwkSKoyMmRELP6o6xDxd7tniomxLHb+vzd0IpprN/UNu/U 9ED8TMCyEUk371Q6BktWgs4gen2hE1CnRbCxMzYScJhk9MASHZ/CDmIKeC9VthwoP17G M/ywJmYdNjO8fqtm7mzxrmbSHXeNs00bhxCnEoS+F2hYLhjqWnE+az8FeytmP4KeyMEv aq3A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=Jo+LJCJ+U9WTofKiZCatW1wCH6xe07St4j/u2716waI=; b=vWBH9QTugpp5n76rM+ydOPxcTx8x0laoQcUYSqMM1GwsLdC5j9hiRcYZ9Ivrpms4Xm zTgxr7lwFwCHsWCcr2rD5nK7C5svfY4mV04caN2iyxj95f/hxOUNUtcCDLXWSfOnyXab adD3ml5JvKZYtAtVHPAY/deq98VZRCE6o396rRiocrKqZWAsonXfExqNFnrwYlJOTvJs XiXV0nEN4KjwyluZjcYvOvihPln00u+yR6X8rBytrZmjhdAuFJn83zrFMH31mEEACiI6 havSTzR2zAyRMPuTwLxb4X5nEdoH6E1QX9Jb/vzYVnFspcPOnCiSYJgKF0HoiAYZGikW 0AhA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w26si2401670otk.156.2020.03.19.21.40.36; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 21:40:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727056AbgCTEig (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 20 Mar 2020 00:38:36 -0400 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:12112 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725446AbgCTEif (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Mar 2020 00:38:35 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS408-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id B3FB4762D19837EEE285; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 12:38:33 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.173.222.27) by DGGEMS408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.208) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 12:38:25 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 23/23] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Expose HW-based SGIs in debugfs To: Marc Zyngier , Auger Eric CC: , , , , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Jason Cooper , "Robert Richter" , Thomas Gleixner , "James Morse" , Julien Thierry , Suzuki K Poulose References: <20200304203330.4967-1-maz@kernel.org> <20200304203330.4967-24-maz@kernel.org> <4cb4c3d4-7b02-bb77-cd7a-c185346b6a2f@redhat.com> <45c282bddd43420024633943c1befac3@kernel.org> From: Zenghui Yu Message-ID: Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 12:38:22 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <45c282bddd43420024633943c1befac3@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.173.222.27] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Marc, On 2020/3/19 23:21, Marc Zyngier wrote: > With GICv4.1, you can introspect the HW state for SGIs. You can also > look at the vLPI state by peeking at the virtual pending table, but > you'd need to unmap the VPE first, Out of curiosity, could you please point me to the "unmap the VPE" requirement in the v4.1 spec? I'd like to have a look. Thanks! Zenghui