Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp495741ybb; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 03:00:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vs/IAE7xNb+pDlhQDS2r84XFPYnCUnSdTfYX30CRQUIczG1Cwid6k+KLew3jyDP0oVsrzlM X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7607:: with SMTP id k7mr5857490otl.205.1584698448830; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 03:00:48 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1584698448; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0MZ5xVezqS1K6BGpz5bWX4ary8pSRofTafeVrELHVUYYuCS9piYeQ7Ndd1Xw1qWX8g bntmzjN9Lg2ARg9E5QFhwtips+2iNKQH9wuAMgIQ1RvfP1lEz3Yz0mWrpoFVqooUJUnD qKVBFAPt5Bd6VZYdfa5c3WK26xn8lXSEOIlOMTr6SKhqufQpjQY6bzPXrvYO5kX+y4Z7 NyiR4UOWZ3KyR247I9t/ep9Ynz7vvJYWt9Q9zGTIcYbr1ySuI8y9+bJt+GN3j2D/fFBr STPCtfPb+Q//CuqRkh+4cXp9GL1SeG6vIG6D1+OyiXxkVY8UE0Y19dMYtGnGGxHTgLEA SB4w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from; bh=KGAukusjSgi5GetOKWuzrtE2fp5//BBUQ+n/asxBg2I=; b=Et3VlzZ/QPfZDiMZaVHMN5Pu77Plqix9+mjnmIMnvL1rAq1bUGxiiBIlEBqs8GDo1E 7UeNEIvLut9NIClxQYWRpfTo4uODlU5YdIiKktbzdYUwR3ZlH6gQb4+j6Ko6WEUwhoXM mqpb7ei20rAj0tE49s7wcxntqMtHlD4qmdGybNTX/5S0Ds4Qcz2eI7KeDjbc6O3+KRHJ f3A0kgh0uI33fZ2cqPEa/lCpw5qBFeyXysqvGNuOtZSAF/VVFr+h0k3UkQ5y3wjUf8sY c16y0ulI0mBa6vvs1gi9x9LGs67gbzOPMZ+aDnNG1x2a3CHSPSLNa0hlkENd0K8hBy0g vXQA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j23si2771366otp.31.2020.03.20.03.00.36; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 03:00:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727000AbgCTKAH (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 20 Mar 2020 06:00:07 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:35131 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726851AbgCTKAH (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Mar 2020 06:00:07 -0400 Received: from p5de0bf0b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.224.191.11] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jFERc-0001Fs-Vc; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 11:00:01 +0100 Received: by nanos.tec.linutronix.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 682AA100375; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 11:00:00 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Andy Lutomirski , Kyung Min Park Cc: X86 ML , LKML , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Greg KH , Andi Kleen , Tony Luck , "Raj\, Ashok" , "Ravi V. Shankar" , Fenghua Yu Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/delay: Introduce TPAUSE delay In-Reply-To: References: <1584677604-32707-1-git-send-email-kyung.min.park@intel.com> <1584677604-32707-3-git-send-email-kyung.min.park@intel.com> Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 11:00:00 +0100 Message-ID: <877dzf4a8v.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andy Lutomirski writes: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 9:13 PM Kyung Min Park wrote: >> void use_tsc_delay(void) >> { >> - if (delay_fn == delay_loop) >> + if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_WAITPKG)) { >> + delay_halt_fn = delay_halt_tpause; >> + delay_fn = delay_halt; >> + } else if (delay_fn == delay_loop) { >> delay_fn = delay_tsc; >> + } >> } > > This is an odd way to dispatch: you're using static_cpu_has(), but > you're using it once to populate a function pointer. Why not just put > the static_cpu_has() directly into delay_halt() and open-code the > three variants? Two: mwaitx and tpause. > That will also make it a lot easier to understand the oddity with > start and cycles. Indeed. That makes sense. Should have thought about it :) Thanks, tglx