Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp619993ybb; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 05:17:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vuUHThFNcoynSjBdB2i3bf7i0z+20d0mYwU5Bd7RISvM9wYzHe9eU5gT33nbTgzwl2OcDOz X-Received: by 2002:aca:61c1:: with SMTP id v184mr5791580oib.123.1584706625561; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 05:17:05 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1584706625; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Vdakex8SRX1LO6NhD6bxp50v1oB7V4NQ2Dpd6tLBccHN1BL5Q9k9XTJlwrLyiM34az 7pb+deGYnnRBnab7Jpmo89y5gvaMJ4mlCHz1gwX/UCPZRXyRSTt1KWEQHkppBjNOw0xj j5u9ycqcxG/AYJ7i0RXtCI/SOpWqkTqOnQGdj6YC+8fvBlRkr0ynRTex4LZqOvz7GfMp 2LSARCRkyw4nZJ8Z86UGMXoCr2H2V6lnFHIyXcInwrlVJjxXACicPxioWhlbVKOFdzKA 0EhEOuOAMrkjxmDx5SttEz6U6OFFf2b9PduNyGh/ni1cvMo06SC4fh7v0ayuw32GQ5pa GP5w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=7DU4BFEH027DS1xtBiza35jxnRowW4xC2oTqrwQMZWU=; b=fwii5KNEv3jibuevDpknsCPKyeOkTlz82l0BhG41sBILh2hpD+xBrFlQG9zeirjyZn gh5pfilRGGVMBY5XtbzRD3FIojikmrJ+VoaQez/9lrGnzS0BibUTfAej3H5tJcHdaBEx khvHM9cc8PJFWEMMd0RLIMs2F89ZWjKm+N8/UD1UnaTV5S+C2mMP05yI6E7P8fIJyihP LeJzj+bRuYexZGMI+TFUYuxyqt4cavRJiFkr0C6WFBoZamrIiZeMQHg2aK8lupRRDaxf HZ7YBgLPfG9ZR0bWNaaP1aVQdG5gdie/2cXgkzc8XnZWbFgrxMupZeFMDKdJ3hkVfi1I Hz2A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u7si2705911otq.29.2020.03.20.05.16.44; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 05:17:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727000AbgCTMPm (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 20 Mar 2020 08:15:42 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:48282 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726893AbgCTMPm (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Mar 2020 08:15:42 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50AC31B; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 05:15:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5A0E13F85E; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 05:15:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 12:15:39 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Tim Harvey Cc: Oleksandr Suvorov , Alison Wang , Igor Opaniuk , "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , Marcel Ziswiler , "lgirdwood@gmail.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "festevam@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [EXT] Re: [PATCH] ASoC: sgtl5000: Revert "ASoC: sgtl5000: Fix of unmute outputs on probe" Message-ID: <20200320121539.GB3961@sirena.org.uk> References: <20191212071847.45561-1-alison.wang@nxp.com> <20191212122318.GB4310@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9zSXsLTf0vkW971A" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: Laugh when you can User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --9zSXsLTf0vkW971A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 01:49:37PM -0700, Tim Harvey wrote: > The response above indicates maybe there was an additional ALSA > control perhaps added as a resolution but I don't see any differences > there. The response is talking about existing controls that are already in the driver. --9zSXsLTf0vkW971A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl50s+sACgkQJNaLcl1U h9BQ8wf/bNkc+gfjOgAy8vg35nBok4c9UrW/sr+phlxjxTDNXqHsikV9NU5wVryf PPMFtP7SNRjy3sKVlkVzph8IhxbMv5BA1DDp2ejW6L0Gh+atXdN4Wr9Cupiw4+PB mf9bOzJ7Ol0cL9nHaaLBZKyBRg8kjw2h9g5T94UDlelR4csnAI7NYlO6crY2xOlR CIDGMt06OapXefylEtQFRXc2usw180zscmOlEmafMku73M2qsyAWiXbvJD2O38Dz QZ9M/NoQpp62WHkPawJXe19ju6n1KrEuPhIr8hW2EcHRbWligh3stcdBrZupXQfd 0TV+XAdvYJRrLzbCEu8v4+poN+b6hw== =PTUB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9zSXsLTf0vkW971A--