Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 20 Mar 2020 13:51:35 -0500
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To:     Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
Cc:     Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@mm-sol.com>,
        Sham Muthayyan <smuthayy@codeaurora.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
        Andrew Murray <amurray@thegoodpenguin.co.uk>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/12] pcie: qcom: add missing reset for ipq806x
Message-ID: <20200320185135.GA242507@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200320183455.21311-5-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 07:34:47PM +0100, Ansuel Smith wrote:
> Add missing ext reset used by ipq806x soc in
> pcie qcom driver

You say "missing" -- does that mean this is a *new* requirement for
this ipq806x device, and previous devices work correctly without this
patch?

Or does this fix an omission and previous devices actually didn't work
correctly?

s/soc/SoC/
s/pcie/PCIe/

Period at end of sentence.  Please wrap to fill 75 columns.