Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp1110650ybb; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 13:34:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtg9fuzb68KdI+saYUAekJSajw46Mm6wCGtGzpwNUwezaOtiQFXIWzzBIiC8xq/0nMcmn6O X-Received: by 2002:aca:fc88:: with SMTP id a130mr7811309oii.89.1584736493692; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 13:34:53 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1584736493; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=GZT8dcI6YuAJe8JlkQWdmUDEIi+u2dAaz2gPQwM2XLXSkG46IqjKB5ekoTB+E8/N61 tkj5LHzH3aPQlat/TWp8nId0ybS6C9D4EB4qom8ykH9mDUhlF77e7XL9VkpV+wGasmM2 bvx8ubF0QQtcu4scoeZjQTKHp8Uw25E0PdScSkvmCSpw3EgNNfEz/a1eZTWZr3FsWjVA /X9taezVswYVRIeMOrVVFZexpN8omOIAegP3g+NGGBTx6VPCu0qNx8i5PKo4zphz7aN5 GyvZe5M1btKM8xnIWYhvMh+8nq9OGg18jrS++uuxaepAMFL9guonKem/CI09yBA6tkLt gr5A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=x8zGXsapHuWnqMC8cZSaagYiLOs94TGgifWsiIRGTSM=; b=pbIpz7NNRF0DPxq5QTRNvIgR6tr0/hqlPOkY7ivQJz0/21vGMqcgrs5lZa7nl6atDx DJ1e2BSzZ/16tf2+4+K6NFeL1/9RQ0lIe0R31mbNMcP0otOFF5wfqLDACDQaAR1pXiB9 RPqi9HDeVYjnbllwVR3glg+PUMdP4EwKIs3zTiC6kq07+owcxJVsYHvoZ/kCUdfSF1Li BxWuIFL5P33siH05ZCTyEewQHzonqQzUnrQ47oybEYeipxGfAF/9s4YSNtxNY0AUNICA Uuy4YPSzKwghnAzAFptU1W/O+aKZ3OgSg9zzjEnu3C+lDE1Nq/az6R/VwDEt4yoFLErm meQw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=YprCCeD9; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k7si3577499otn.251.2020.03.20.13.34.41; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 13:34:53 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=YprCCeD9; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727213AbgCTUeO (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 20 Mar 2020 16:34:14 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-f68.google.com ([209.85.216.68]:50825 "EHLO mail-pj1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726855AbgCTUeO (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Mar 2020 16:34:14 -0400 Received: by mail-pj1-f68.google.com with SMTP id v13so3013152pjb.0 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 13:34:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=x8zGXsapHuWnqMC8cZSaagYiLOs94TGgifWsiIRGTSM=; b=YprCCeD9Wl+McB6ZRErSXSnfWwEZBH5YThXbWzDhm9ZWAPbyBLeTaZxu4kts8/HVC+ 7zB1EcA5VN5akzU7Mp+X2R2flpKXTzM62cvzUUWSu8v9W0SkHw3vTIupRKLok16UN10k eAKKs52fMZzRnNJwBb2X+mfGkFNg1bGMItzSxbwHcsoF4ymsUPOqrAzE0c1G4H0qft4E +phE/Ml3hNTb+rO/d1d3qvhJTelnmlyTaa5VczkZDFQjnnQQ1RXPnVruhAtBDbr0JRxk xWzLW2z2FGckcMgPmizse39QL4IeQSnV94UuzyNPINKDxKU+SKeDsK5sP+kG0CHYZHn9 8Lsw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=x8zGXsapHuWnqMC8cZSaagYiLOs94TGgifWsiIRGTSM=; b=tVrD8VNciIHUTMvAVkW2vlmqZyAnnSOV8ahSWsTsemPKQq4nx/Kzh1+7JrO9bTRMFO VEOVQml+xTK23efhxmNOsfxwIzK+I3qx9yiLd5/bITmbE1JbhjGSn/HpZc9mY+luhP/o RbfavrIAu50u/CtyaJkOhFSzaxtb9qTGiipK1oFnTRUr7kBMjS0thVRBGW+BlBJUU7Kx 5T4k9bdParnEXLqYH8Elv9QYppiMG+AoPq7udD/51mDCW2NOGdFI+i2Epr1Kjn5GoBPw oFvB8c01Qn5VXXqleihc9ZQKCbYrkHxkz2PE/EO2l5aIcSeScMSFY4PYUhP5uiuAZJYg 9QcA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1lA8iXOQDsrFzg5dlT/Ky+M4ADKgylV2o/7bNcRKAL3uS6V08E HR24UyE0CVx3C04Z9U2dDsM8Aw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:e013:: with SMTP id u19mr11095637pjy.65.1584736452872; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 13:34:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps15 (S0106002369de4dac.cg.shawcable.net. [68.147.8.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d206sm6174522pfd.160.2020.03.20.13.34.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 20 Mar 2020 13:34:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 14:34:09 -0600 From: Mathieu Poirier To: Suman Anna Cc: Bjorn Andersson , Ohad Ben-Cohen , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Andrew F. Davis" , Tero Kristo Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 RESEND 03/15] remoteproc/omap: Add a sanity check for DSP boot address alignment Message-ID: <20200320203409.GC16145@xps15> References: <20200313081718.30612-4-t-kristo@ti.com> <20200314004334.26509-1-s-anna@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200314004334.26509-1-s-anna@ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 07:43:34PM -0500, Suman Anna wrote: > The DSP remote processors on OMAP SoCs require a boot register to > be programmed with a boot address, and this boot address needs to > be on a 1KB boundary. The current code is simply masking the boot > address appropriately without performing any sanity checks before > releasing the resets. An unaligned boot address results in an > undefined execution behavior and can result in various bus errors > like MMU Faults or L3 NoC errors. Such errors are hard to debug and > can be easily avoided by adding a sanity check for the alignment > before booting a DSP remote processor. > > Signed-off-by: Suman Anna > Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo > Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson > Reviewed-by: Andrew F. Davis > Acked-by: Mathieu Poirier > --- > v8-Resend: Updated to fix compilation issues against rproc-next > > drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c > index d47d5ded651a..fe11cb709770 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c > @@ -121,14 +121,23 @@ static void omap_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid) > * @rproc: handle of a remote processor > * > * Set boot address for a supported DSP remote processor. > + * > + * Return: 0 on success, or -EINVAL if boot address is not aligned properly > */ > -static void omap_rproc_write_dsp_boot_addr(struct rproc *rproc) > +static int omap_rproc_write_dsp_boot_addr(struct rproc *rproc) > { > + struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent; > struct omap_rproc *oproc = rproc->priv; > struct omap_rproc_boot_data *bdata = oproc->boot_data; > u32 offset = bdata->boot_reg; > > - regmap_write(bdata->syscon, offset, rproc->bootaddr); > + if (rproc->bootaddr & (SZ_1K - 1)) { > + dev_err(dev, "invalid boot address 0x%llx, must be aligned on a 1KB boundary\n", > + rproc->bootaddr); Yes it does fix the compilation problem but after that patch 7 doesn't apply anymore. > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + return regmap_write(bdata->syscon, offset, rproc->bootaddr); > } > > /* > @@ -145,8 +154,11 @@ static int omap_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc) > int ret; > struct mbox_client *client = &oproc->client; > > - if (oproc->boot_data) > - omap_rproc_write_dsp_boot_addr(rproc); > + if (oproc->boot_data) { > + ret = omap_rproc_write_dsp_boot_addr(rproc); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + } > > client->dev = dev; > client->tx_done = NULL; > -- > 2.23.0 >