Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161382AbWBUFyI (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2006 00:54:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161387AbWBUFyI (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2006 00:54:08 -0500 Received: from b3162.static.pacific.net.au ([203.143.238.98]:20886 "EHLO cust8446.nsw01.dataco.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161382AbWBUFyH (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2006 00:54:07 -0500 From: Nigel Cunningham Organization: Cyclades Corporation To: Dmitry Torokhov Subject: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 15:51:08 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Andreas Happe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suspend2 Devel List References: <20060201113710.6320.68289.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <200602211257.29161.ncunningham@cyclades.com> <200602202319.15018.dtor_core@ameritech.net> In-Reply-To: <200602202319.15018.dtor_core@ameritech.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1723553.hkVoe4Wdc0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200602211551.12379.ncunningham@cyclades.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1729 Lines: 50 --nextPart1723553.hkVoe4Wdc0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi. On Tuesday 21 February 2006 14:19, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Monday 20 February 2006 21:57, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > For the record, my thinking went: swsusp uses n (12?) bytes of meta data > > for every page you save, where as using bitmaps makes that much closer = to > > a constant value (a small variable amount for recording where the image > > will be stored in extents). 12 bytes per page is 3MB/1GB. If swsusp was > > to add support for multiple swap partitions or writing to files, those > > requirements might be closer to 5MB/GB. > > 5MB/GB amounts to 0.5% overhead, I don't think you should be concerned > here. Much more important IMHO is that IIRC swsusp requires to be able to > free 1/2 of the physical memory whuch is hard on low memory boxes. Agreed. I'll look for related issues, and if there are none (or nothing=20 serious), we can have one less difference between the two implementations. = I=20 may even be able to share the lowlevel code with Pavel then. That would be = a=20 good step forward. Regards, Nigel --nextPart1723553.hkVoe4Wdc0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBD+qpQN0y+n1M3mo0RAqPKAJsGAra0TFldL24tbYkMsh/tHLWU9QCfQOU6 gYRAQueVrs8NvKA+Ijy5Uic= =4Bu4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1723553.hkVoe4Wdc0-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/