Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp1162220ybb; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 14:39:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvNLsg98rZcOZW/pxF2xpSD6J9Qmc6NOrP/Kc2yIG1O6oXdZc2Ioc/ZgkmIEc1s7Sqr6YT+ X-Received: by 2002:a9d:20e2:: with SMTP id x89mr8106364ota.252.1584740345823; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 14:39:05 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1584740345; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ysd4Jp8ryej9oXwMdYkDdyIQrGA6tftNolZVgI/uBK32Cb+qU8DEiYwtuR/5OxoytX 6pkKivQfURlVVKiworZSKkfZZvKbk6hDh76ZwuBQqHMwRtPRrZg7yE+b07d3OShAUcRQ UO9kf5xw3H3G8L/1lMHbOWlgtP8YqMOU+uo99vsbaoCMC7XBBSA+7kp2iyi1vYKx0MwV ZEdEfmcpY+A47jnKFYCB6ANnTFsiLyMpfeGPwIxOTqsWH16O5VftmXQJv/kw5qqFMJRT OFgww0iZUvjjEVhI99Eq7u01NMdKILjcadnxD9j27U4eTJZLgsiPEmYQDkKqwurvrItd 9BBw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=0NN4MNZ/hF1UQNXaLNMovZy4BsamJlFbU9vvVUiEgr4=; b=gWfxTz0Id5M5Uz6qLh5NBTuuNGrf/FjhDZQVcHUw/7vIZsOdr+NaXofyp+0QdNXIgU FEnVs0laAHa0VYiJYdjzYhxmbWxSDhAJQOICdBTUM/a9axeOWBmmCL9I9CbVV3uaKVbN XZUDbyAG7YVxl+vQ4srKDUuvCyP9oi49bkDJ6b/Iq3fXpyR85WWsHiqnk38SWu9azXG4 XSk3Blx8+S8D3pVeOmn/pguvdH56/RNWgkRdCSH4USikI05ORFr1N1TTBBllkT2bOtFN zi4/pOWK7IYIwrjHld9REG/ooVm7wIlyPlJRIGCTfAHL6UmfBfGCt/DXVy/PSVWMKpmt ipzQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=yHYX0qbj; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u135si3327529oif.248.2020.03.20.14.38.50; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 14:39:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=yHYX0qbj; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727041AbgCTVi0 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 20 Mar 2020 17:38:26 -0400 Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.248]:54826 "EHLO lelv0143.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726666AbgCTViZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Mar 2020 17:38:25 -0400 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 02KLcOeU043981; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 16:38:24 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1584740304; bh=0NN4MNZ/hF1UQNXaLNMovZy4BsamJlFbU9vvVUiEgr4=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=yHYX0qbjyyV71a66TP8YBNLfIXoTdy+QDzFD/HweoSR6iYGi5jWJOa/4DwVvPXZZL ygEBOiHq+amg/mWk6ErfBj2pBCBk9nd+EQ2FQM/cohfRjYOqYgE3tbD/3hF4vjRA+T Xiun0FLNjp2CDVrdUwiO08bv2hLPL/kY6lEj2n9A= Received: from DLEE112.ent.ti.com (dlee112.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.23]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02KLcOXY017875 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 20 Mar 2020 16:38:24 -0500 Received: from DLEE112.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.23) by DLEE112.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 16:38:24 -0500 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DLEE112.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 16:38:24 -0500 Received: from [10.250.86.212] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 02KLcOp8108796; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 16:38:24 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 RESEND 03/15] remoteproc/omap: Add a sanity check for DSP boot address alignment To: Mathieu Poirier CC: Bjorn Andersson , Ohad Ben-Cohen , , , "Andrew F. Davis" , Tero Kristo References: <20200313081718.30612-4-t-kristo@ti.com> <20200314004334.26509-1-s-anna@ti.com> <20200320203409.GC16145@xps15> From: Suman Anna Message-ID: <2d186bf1-db04-5f69-62a8-d1970e0592a4@ti.com> Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 16:38:23 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200320203409.GC16145@xps15> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 3/20/20 3:34 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 07:43:34PM -0500, Suman Anna wrote: >> The DSP remote processors on OMAP SoCs require a boot register to >> be programmed with a boot address, and this boot address needs to >> be on a 1KB boundary. The current code is simply masking the boot >> address appropriately without performing any sanity checks before >> releasing the resets. An unaligned boot address results in an >> undefined execution behavior and can result in various bus errors >> like MMU Faults or L3 NoC errors. Such errors are hard to debug and >> can be easily avoided by adding a sanity check for the alignment >> before booting a DSP remote processor. >> >> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna >> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo >> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson >> Reviewed-by: Andrew F. Davis >> Acked-by: Mathieu Poirier >> --- >> v8-Resend: Updated to fix compilation issues against rproc-next >> >> drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++---- >> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c >> index d47d5ded651a..fe11cb709770 100644 >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c >> @@ -121,14 +121,23 @@ static void omap_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid) >> * @rproc: handle of a remote processor >> * >> * Set boot address for a supported DSP remote processor. >> + * >> + * Return: 0 on success, or -EINVAL if boot address is not aligned properly >> */ >> -static void omap_rproc_write_dsp_boot_addr(struct rproc *rproc) >> +static int omap_rproc_write_dsp_boot_addr(struct rproc *rproc) >> { >> + struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent; >> struct omap_rproc *oproc = rproc->priv; >> struct omap_rproc_boot_data *bdata = oproc->boot_data; >> u32 offset = bdata->boot_reg; >> >> - regmap_write(bdata->syscon, offset, rproc->bootaddr); >> + if (rproc->bootaddr & (SZ_1K - 1)) { >> + dev_err(dev, "invalid boot address 0x%llx, must be aligned on a 1KB boundary\n", >> + rproc->bootaddr); > > Yes it does fix the compilation problem but after that patch 7 doesn't apply > anymore. git am -3 should apply the patch. I didn't resend that one since there were no code changes. regards Suman > >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + return regmap_write(bdata->syscon, offset, rproc->bootaddr); >> } >> >> /* >> @@ -145,8 +154,11 @@ static int omap_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc) >> int ret; >> struct mbox_client *client = &oproc->client; >> >> - if (oproc->boot_data) >> - omap_rproc_write_dsp_boot_addr(rproc); >> + if (oproc->boot_data) { >> + ret = omap_rproc_write_dsp_boot_addr(rproc); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + } >> >> client->dev = dev; >> client->tx_done = NULL; >> -- >> 2.23.0 >>