Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp1171849ybb; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 14:53:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vueoHqd2NR3CGNXLcDQE2oWsy45Tku/7DQlr2DACjuWxt2A4j1HGJ6A2DGZAzvKVNr9c/kk X-Received: by 2002:aca:75d5:: with SMTP id q204mr8653227oic.9.1584741194084; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 14:53:14 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1584741194; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=LiSQNErdF92dw0M1iFfXFw8Z12slzZv75H1a26WnqWF7U3TeWBZssm2p3uLD9nDoIL NhHZfCPVS1zjTGxabolRlQwQ5C21/9OwF7MKlJDurZ4nNdaHw6lr1zhk1DGIPqJlaqvY U2aKytT9VzGoYt1bL7WhSyIRfe2soFIMXDukv03424pjf7vNuCumQ4BTy/qppIXNpaCw dlLG2h4H2JxEOKiaNwMIWG/le9yA6hz/IB7GbsCWeeRPEZpBjVs0/qiSLEoE8/PxfHbS 6woAj1965hQ2Q3D2saVPEWv98B5/t9CtaPueFRMQIaSdauvwaxAZw+yGPp+cbAAVJ7rT 2Hcg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=d5cFv4zcPDheqlIYA6pBb4q04VZmxgJ/nn5Hshez8sc=; b=TN0tZnH9EiZ66oEj+YjXXSePu1CodQERuwn2ARN3jnCXuvtn/fL9D0FJWnqao24Be2 29uKqo9lfJSyQFXzy7aNzaJFs4nZgjdtC/upKsyWTy5pRNSdbZmrIdFhwVBT1sHsUHM4 UzO83KX7b/ORi8XtGQeBJcSV+zXx19xJT+YNBYAMEbfUY/lH/3AhUyAaVbhjZ784fONX UWknPBqziYb7hY3IF3JxaNk857WWya+p6x+tWcd4h0UiD5On6WInaBoV8dQATvBXR5LG ntTDyOnS8wapRuSRiaprutZJ839h3yQKPaMbdR09okTCkc/JHy2Gx4/Z+ytiwM4ItdbI Uq1A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=rtV2Ljfq; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r7si3970339oth.222.2020.03.20.14.53.00; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 14:53:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=rtV2Ljfq; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727197AbgCTVvX (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 20 Mar 2020 17:51:23 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:44308 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726666AbgCTVvX (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Mar 2020 17:51:23 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f44.google.com (mail-wr1-f44.google.com [209.85.221.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 12975216FD for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 21:51:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1584741082; bh=tnlLUvNFcgfDBUYCx5ccdiQoD4rY41g0BG8LE1O08T0=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=rtV2LjfqEcp4GQZKXpK8xBMgkmN8RJCAKP7sdu26KDf6+KnrnPcMlJcGj9W+EcoMh 5oGm45rao+5CS9GZ3VV69Xut2+aR1XUaEKxQ3QRQjncWAK7+3nNfJxQ1ZzbPUDdRen T8rFvqq3T8s+NuLqNmz3770mcsZemLRRYVQ4DrHc= Received: by mail-wr1-f44.google.com with SMTP id w10so9297031wrm.4 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 14:51:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1f3P3OYZVArC6njY1AUrXiHuPw80KzbJXHlcIYouGOg+V441f8 /We27bUTbk1uWZOxBanfZmXprJEZXi8c3rIeuInLnA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:df8f:: with SMTP id z15mr13377202wrl.184.1584741080378; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 14:51:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1584677604-32707-1-git-send-email-kyung.min.park@intel.com> <1584677604-32707-3-git-send-email-kyung.min.park@intel.com> <877dzf4a8v.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <877dzf4a8v.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> From: Andy Lutomirski Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 14:51:08 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/delay: Introduce TPAUSE delay To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Andy Lutomirski , Kyung Min Park , X86 ML , LKML , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Greg KH , Andi Kleen , Tony Luck , "Raj, Ashok" , "Ravi V. Shankar" , Fenghua Yu Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 3:00 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > Andy Lutomirski writes: > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 9:13 PM Kyung Min Park wrote: > >> void use_tsc_delay(void) > >> { > >> - if (delay_fn == delay_loop) > >> + if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_WAITPKG)) { > >> + delay_halt_fn = delay_halt_tpause; > >> + delay_fn = delay_halt; > >> + } else if (delay_fn == delay_loop) { > >> delay_fn = delay_tsc; > >> + } > >> } > > > > This is an odd way to dispatch: you're using static_cpu_has(), but > > you're using it once to populate a function pointer. Why not just put > > the static_cpu_has() directly into delay_halt() and open-code the > > three variants? > > Two: mwaitx and tpause. I was imagining there would also be a variant for systems with neither feature.