Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 20 Mar 2020 17:09:30 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To:     Henry Chen <henryc.chen@mediatek.com>
Cc:     Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@linaro.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
        Ryan Case <ryandcase@chromium.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@google.com>,
        Fan Chen <fan.chen@mediatek.com>,
        James Liao <jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com>,
        Arvin Wang <arvin.wang@mediatek.com>,
        Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 08/13] dt-bindings: interconnect: add MT8183
 interconnect dt-bindings
Message-ID: <20200320230930.GA10504@bogus>
References: <1584092066-24425-1-git-send-email-henryc.chen@mediatek.com>
 <1584092066-24425-9-git-send-email-henryc.chen@mediatek.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1584092066-24425-9-git-send-email-henryc.chen@mediatek.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 05:34:21PM +0800, Henry Chen wrote:
> Add interconnect provider dt-bindings for MT8183.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Henry Chen <henryc.chen@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/dvfsrc.txt        |  9 +++++++++
>  include/dt-bindings/interconnect/mtk,mt8183-emi.h      | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/interconnect/mtk,mt8183-emi.h
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/dvfsrc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/dvfsrc.txt
> index 7f43499..da98ec9 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/dvfsrc.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/dvfsrc.txt
> @@ -12,6 +12,11 @@ Required Properties:
>  - clock-names: Must include the following entries:
>  	"dvfsrc": DVFSRC module clock
>  - clocks: Must contain an entry for each entry in clock-names.
> +- #interconnect-cells : should contain 1
> +- interconnect : interconnect providers support dram bandwidth requirements.
> +	The provider is able to communicate with the DVFSRC and send the dram
> +	bandwidth to it. shall contain only one of the following:
> +	"mediatek,mt8183-emi"
>  
>  Example:
>  
> @@ -20,4 +25,8 @@ Example:
>  		reg = <0 0x10012000 0 0x1000>;
>  		clocks = <&infracfg CLK_INFRA_DVFSRC>;
>  		clock-names = "dvfsrc";
> +		ddr_emi: interconnect {
> +			compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-emi";
> +			#interconnect-cells = <1>;

Nodes with a compatible and no defined way to access the hardware always 
look suspicious. Can't you make the parent node an interconnect 
provider.

Rob