Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp3003925ybb; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 12:53:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vs9Bux48kk+ta2yZ4pW8rjIMEPJIq0ktetjT5RStZP/SitKY7diWvu/LoS0GOaJGrnjjeCs X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6b85:: with SMTP id b5mr13962395otq.101.1584906834768; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 12:53:54 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1584906834; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dksmtDnRG2xMLDnu4oNmhH5DZetI9e7loFtBKsstQfMZQU5SEEp3Zv/76CLoCDi/0n KwfMgNd98KHTtkAesbn+O47ZwQP+TxXo7Prw1V5WBTfAiut9tJNmQC5Ad/KPGz9CMBZA Pi7OxoJTpbmYVgpgmpMtWJR/NhPCDJ2UgsEW9dnqfWh8Xgi4CfPBhPg4Fk0UVC5U/Oqo BhH+HI3OQf0YP/aqQyhDYyfIC+dg1/tTNg/U1+51eluY6PLn334oJUXnTvExxM8Q24ZE v7nxOMgY0hX/JxHIsEgTl2sTN4/4a60bOt57HuMQ6V5t09OmPpRSUTpl65IYLoJVns1T avNA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=XQTRvL7Xn3PvuGFp8eHvRPzLnUU1WOdTqlpGOYSFVSQ=; b=ImAtVd8htiCt9UJysXr7z4XAUcyaiw3oMuFiMMEhkigh5PJJMmnyzN0gkJPuqm8n3f AeIjrFEixX0tc+7kJyQYMAFP6/rPcRQgx3IDkrjtmN/VaMIf6BRLdgO5PRpo3h1Y3+5n BDRFdh5dBggXClxgEiQcHNRt+CQssGnSqsCTRrOKktHkLKRgoPZOTPNKmz0FWVcjshyR vIgrO6EMjjIKnznjgs1ov5QHgytBuvOn2GpqLv4pqL+/sqCfc0SE+90J7R5jyAjm5AG4 3P1sHaGpOrprfna414L9ZPmEZOrrbnEl0I+sbLT/nzriTfFL1p4/+LMJqqpGKnSalUlG uURQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g2si345022otr.13.2020.03.22.12.53.30; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 12:53:54 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726797AbgCVTvh (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 22 Mar 2020 15:51:37 -0400 Received: from jabberwock.ucw.cz ([46.255.230.98]:36356 "EHLO jabberwock.ucw.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726583AbgCVTvh (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Mar 2020 15:51:37 -0400 Received: by jabberwock.ucw.cz (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 1D0771C033C; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 20:51:35 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 20:51:34 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Sasha Levin Cc: Guenter Roeck , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Kevin Hao Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.5 00/65] 5.5.11-rc1 review Message-ID: <20200322195134.GA3127@duo.ucw.cz> References: <20200319123926.466988514@linuxfoundation.org> <20200319145900.GC92193@kroah.com> <32c627bf-0e6b-8bc4-88d3-032a69484aa6@roeck-us.net> <20200320144658.GK4189@sasha-vm> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200320144658.GK4189@sasha-vm> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! > > > Thanks for letting me know, I've now dropped that patch (others > > > complained about it for other reasons) and will push out a -rc2 with > > > that fix. > > >=20 > >=20 > > I did wonder why the offending patch was included, but then I figured t= hat > > I lost the "we apply too many patches to stable releases" battle, and I= didn't > > want to re-litigate it. >=20 > I usually much rather take prerequisite patches rather than do > backports, which is why that patch was selected. Unfortunately, that results in less useful -stable. Best regards, Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRPfPO7r0eAhk010v0w5/Bqldv68gUCXnfBxgAKCRAw5/Bqldv6 8vd0AJ4zzgG0kwMalfU/hzmGareDQj+tkgCfXEoBcazXsKSah/ct3Zx1qGWDwc8= =BRHX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+--