Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 23 Mar 2020 10:00:21 +0200
From:   Timo Teras <timo.teras@iki.fi>
To:     YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Cc:     <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>, <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
        <davem@davemloft.net>, <kuba@kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] xfrm: policy: Fix doulbe free in xfrm_policy_timer
Message-ID: <20200323100021.05d68204@vostro.wlan>
In-Reply-To: <20200323073239.59000-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>
References: <20200318034839.57996-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>
        <20200323073239.59000-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 15:32:39 +0800
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> wrote:

> After xfrm_add_policy add a policy, its ref is 2, then
> 
>                              xfrm_policy_timer
>                                read_lock
>                                xp->walk.dead is 0
>                                ....
>                                mod_timer()
> xfrm_policy_kill
>   policy->walk.dead = 1
>   ....
>   del_timer(&policy->timer)
>     xfrm_pol_put //ref is 1
>   xfrm_pol_put  //ref is 0
>     xfrm_policy_destroy
>       call_rcu
>                                  xfrm_pol_hold //ref is 1
>                                read_unlock
>                                xfrm_pol_put //ref is 0
>                                  xfrm_policy_destroy
>                                   call_rcu
> 
> xfrm_policy_destroy is called twice, which may leads to
> double free.
> 
> Call Trace:
> RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0x161/0x210
> ...
>  xfrm_policy_timer+0x522/0x600
>  call_timer_fn+0x1b3/0x5e0
>  ? __xfrm_decode_session+0x2990/0x2990
>  ? msleep+0xb0/0xb0
>  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x40
>  ? __xfrm_decode_session+0x2990/0x2990
>  ? __xfrm_decode_session+0x2990/0x2990
>  run_timer_softirq+0x5c5/0x10e0
> 
> Fix this by use write_lock_bh in xfrm_policy_kill.
> 
> Fixes: ea2dea9dacc2 ("xfrm: remove policy lock when accessing policy->walk.dead")
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>

Acked-by: Timo Teräs <timo.teras@iki.fi>

> ---
> v3: Only lock 'policy->walk.dead'
> v2: Fix typo 'write_lock_bh'--> 'write_unlock_bh' while unlocking
> ---
>  net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> index dbda08ec566e..8a4af86a285e 100644
> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> @@ -434,7 +434,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_policy_destroy);
>  
>  static void xfrm_policy_kill(struct xfrm_policy *policy)
>  {
> +	write_lock_bh(&policy->lock);
>  	policy->walk.dead = 1;
> +	write_unlock_bh(&policy->lock);
>  
>  	atomic_inc(&policy->genid);
>  
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 
>