Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp4063967ybb; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 12:47:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vs3sF6HnebAwKnZ+TaTrZ0pls6atiHFqOPPF5SK+/o04B9u7EieBJhFW0C3FCoYKVrTGuSF X-Received: by 2002:aca:4ecc:: with SMTP id c195mr722124oib.123.1584992824063; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 12:47:04 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1584992824; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Kd76b+9PWxcK/v95+R8cO/yWXH6875utfP3FDaAw++WR3Tcmr7G7Dx3uIT46yfnvIr jYle8pH7RIovOK+pSG7eTbwyT6vmYzilSB4BfWNZ9lml1cIv2t+jG0keDCGB0l/18ZIT 09/l8PDsdFhCjTdTtp8y/+gyIi6Ck1YhBIZvIaj9qvY660dLtLgb3OV3h593zlCaOlWl Hp1l+LsARWkmtymoqHfsBcwKIgqrS+4OoGolU6WvlI5fqgLDRUFfvNnPe7MmuzbzVNe5 pldjJDnFKsv34gZNIrdd+J41MwrdoiqRO81qPB3pduvoDztMhqF6T+0GAP42nf8KdIj3 79cg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=ls4G6lKYt71Y0XHFWkt5nDqXPlvj9q0Xq6iH0HNGuqM=; b=MRSV6Wp7VzWuFAvyEdKzdNubo8zAly6cwJue5UqbUgKpTSDVJYPnyjmpA8xqyxOVcc q/2ZCIWjNlt1mw83RKRikb7JOUa20KDZYAjwQmG0MKcgZkaOPpCnGwzey9F/LfqSXi3U /3RTU7dpXIPbyp6dTcgf8WvwVy+NS+HNdwYpuwX4R3hrBIKV6//75ZfpB79aPw6JN+3V D2iWQBySngKEbeU+l6SOT82J7nxfE3Zh176VfUvV7Ml9pgqRiaXOuTs1q5vz/RvWX++0 bBrpE0mQU5MPvE9ITJx3fxmYt/arsLwZ+49RFXMMYeAJUxHq8q8jL7/zoQ6lEYsymxyi 2H0A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=WG07lqEp; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m125si7476996oia.240.2020.03.23.12.46.49; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 12:47:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=WG07lqEp; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727053AbgCWTom (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 23 Mar 2020 15:44:42 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-f66.google.com ([209.85.216.66]:53137 "EHLO mail-pj1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726764AbgCWTom (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Mar 2020 15:44:42 -0400 Received: by mail-pj1-f66.google.com with SMTP id ng8so335190pjb.2 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 12:44:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=ls4G6lKYt71Y0XHFWkt5nDqXPlvj9q0Xq6iH0HNGuqM=; b=WG07lqEpeapNlf+q9UhkvXekq1R2/kM+rxpL4XAMpxJf2QVYMEOFaDgJ1BJTHpgRZC jDaKZB9+DGrG33wwzu19a0mx0kiWNijGGl1pUTqq0ljioxipjy03c4VFZPRELVCP0Dg0 4/bW4JhFRbWml+M7I0FBl9RebdX2ykFPTxQi0= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=ls4G6lKYt71Y0XHFWkt5nDqXPlvj9q0Xq6iH0HNGuqM=; b=fuQXgkpWL9SbAHRe+NmnfrdeJXwvNm1YuJ2cT7Cox4UWeCWQ4CdkxjC2lUmwhwUTMb i3idKahZMaMh8V1t/efA06nr2ZMOG1HsRfb7R0JwwcjbWtftZ+3QhyFEfHoduNQV17LX CJQRMpWfulGFzNVcI9rxm4UmfoTNZv3Xf9+9LMcRSd6T5XGC9Hv5ZF1WJc7ttUghRlrT nCu7hc7jLBOSQ1lt/NpBb3rrW99z5CKJ6legjMffz72FGSgfad1PFY21apMbcs+GPCFk 5aW8z78ADFYzDLuHnDEvIREIEqA8brQw/i6u476++ktUqMsGUY1Sy7EjFs6Ao2Hdzmqq WiLg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3BnGObyMuK9wHEOuSlgIEBnMzXMAjMbGYHgDcICLAr2XE13qYz ayxt5ScvO9ENmUI3FRhnOg2fCw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8648:: with SMTP id y8mr22771881plt.153.1584992680710; Mon, 23 Mar 2020 12:44:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.outflux.net (smtp.outflux.net. [198.145.64.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 19sm13145800pgx.63.2020.03.23.12.44.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 23 Mar 2020 12:44:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 12:44:38 -0700 From: Kees Cook To: KP Singh Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, Brendan Jackman , Florent Revest , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , James Morris , Paul Turner , Jann Horn , Florent Revest , Brendan Jackman , Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 5/7] bpf: lsm: Initialize the BPF LSM hooks Message-ID: <202003231237.F654B379@keescook> References: <20200323164415.12943-1-kpsingh@chromium.org> <20200323164415.12943-6-kpsingh@chromium.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200323164415.12943-6-kpsingh@chromium.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 05:44:13PM +0100, KP Singh wrote: > From: KP Singh > > The bpf_lsm_ nops are initialized into the LSM framework like any other > LSM. Some LSM hooks do not have 0 as their default return value. The > __weak symbol for these hooks is overridden by a corresponding > definition in security/bpf/hooks.c > > The LSM can be enabled / disabled with CONFIG_LSM. > > Signed-off-by: KP Singh Nice! This is super clean on the LSM side of things. :) One note below... > Reviewed-by: Brendan Jackman > Reviewed-by: Florent Revest > --- > security/Kconfig | 10 ++++---- > security/Makefile | 2 ++ > security/bpf/Makefile | 5 ++++ > security/bpf/hooks.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 security/bpf/Makefile > create mode 100644 security/bpf/hooks.c > > diff --git a/security/Kconfig b/security/Kconfig > index 2a1a2d396228..cd3cc7da3a55 100644 > --- a/security/Kconfig > +++ b/security/Kconfig > @@ -277,11 +277,11 @@ endchoice > > config LSM > string "Ordered list of enabled LSMs" > - default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,smack,selinux,tomoyo,apparmor" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_SMACK > - default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,apparmor,selinux,smack,tomoyo" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR > - default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,tomoyo" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_TOMOYO > - default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_DAC > - default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,selinux,smack,tomoyo,apparmor" > + default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,smack,selinux,tomoyo,apparmor,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_SMACK > + default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,apparmor,selinux,smack,tomoyo,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR > + default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,tomoyo,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_TOMOYO > + default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,bpf" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_DAC > + default "lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,selinux,smack,tomoyo,apparmor,bpf" > help > A comma-separated list of LSMs, in initialization order. > Any LSMs left off this list will be ignored. This can be > diff --git a/security/Makefile b/security/Makefile > index 746438499029..22e73a3482bd 100644 > --- a/security/Makefile > +++ b/security/Makefile > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ subdir-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_YAMA) += yama > subdir-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_LOADPIN) += loadpin > subdir-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_SAFESETID) += safesetid > subdir-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_LOCKDOWN_LSM) += lockdown > +subdir-$(CONFIG_BPF_LSM) += bpf > > # always enable default capabilities > obj-y += commoncap.o > @@ -30,6 +31,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_LOADPIN) += loadpin/ > obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_SAFESETID) += safesetid/ > obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_LOCKDOWN_LSM) += lockdown/ > obj-$(CONFIG_CGROUP_DEVICE) += device_cgroup.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_LSM) += bpf/ > > # Object integrity file lists > subdir-$(CONFIG_INTEGRITY) += integrity > diff --git a/security/bpf/Makefile b/security/bpf/Makefile > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..c7a89a962084 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/security/bpf/Makefile > @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +# > +# Copyright (C) 2020 Google LLC. > + > +obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_LSM) := hooks.o > diff --git a/security/bpf/hooks.c b/security/bpf/hooks.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..68e5824868f9 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/security/bpf/hooks.c > @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > + > +/* > + * Copyright (C) 2020 Google LLC. > + */ > +#include > +#include > + > +/* Some LSM hooks do not have 0 as their default return values. Override the > + * __weak definitons generated by default for these hooks If you wanted to avoid this, couldn't you make the default return value part of lsm_hooks.h? e.g.: LSM_HOOK(int, -EOPNOTSUPP, inode_getsecurity, struct inode *inode, const char *name, void **buffer, bool alloc) ... #define LSM_HOOK(RET, DEFAULT, NAME, ...) \ LSM_HOOK_##RET(NAME, DEFAULT, __VA_ARGS__) ... #define LSM_HOOK_int(NAME, DEFAULT, ...) \ noinline int bpf_lsm_##NAME(__VA_ARGS__) \ { \ return (DEFAULT); \ } Then all the __weak stuff is gone, and the following 4 functions don't need to be written out, and the information is available to the macros if anyone else might ever want it. -Kees > + */ > +noinline int bpf_lsm_inode_getsecurity(struct inode *inode, const char *name, > + void **buffer, bool alloc) > +{ > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > +} > + > +noinline int bpf_lsm_inode_setsecurity(struct inode *inode, const char *name, > + const void *value, size_t size, > + int flags) > +{ > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > +} > + > +noinline int bpf_lsm_task_prctl(int option, unsigned long arg2, > + unsigned long arg3, unsigned long arg4, > + unsigned long arg5) > +{ > + return -ENOSYS; > +} > + > +noinline int bpf_lsm_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(struct xfrm_state *x, > + struct xfrm_policy *xp, > + const struct flowi *fl) > +{ > + return 1; > +} > + > +static struct security_hook_list bpf_lsm_hooks[] __lsm_ro_after_init = { > + #define LSM_HOOK(RET, NAME, ...) LSM_HOOK_INIT(NAME, bpf_lsm_##NAME), > + #include > + #undef LSM_HOOK > +}; > + > +static int __init bpf_lsm_init(void) > +{ > + security_add_hooks(bpf_lsm_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_lsm_hooks), "bpf"); > + pr_info("LSM support for eBPF active\n"); > + return 0; > +} > + > +DEFINE_LSM(bpf) = { > + .name = "bpf", > + .init = bpf_lsm_init, > +}; > -- > 2.20.1 > -- Kees Cook