Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 23 Mar 2020 14:44:54 -0600
From:   "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
To:     bp@alien8.de
Cc:     Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Thomas Lendacky <Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com>,
        Mauro Rossi <issor.oruam@gmail.com>,
        Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/changes: Raise minimum supported binutils
 version to 2.23
Message-ID: <20200323204454.GA2611336@zx2c4.com>
References: <20200113161310.GA191743@rani.riverdale.lan>
 <20200113195337.604646-1-nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
 <202001131750.C1B8468@keescook>
 <20200114165135.GK31032@zn.tnic>
 <20200115002131.GA3258770@rani.riverdale.lan>
 <20200115122458.GB20975@zn.tnic>
 <20200316160259.GN26126@zn.tnic>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200316160259.GN26126@zn.tnic>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 05:02:59PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Long overdue patch, see below.
> 
> Plan is to queue it after 5.7-rc1.
> 
> ---
> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 16:28:36 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] Documentation/changes: Raise minimum supported binutilsa version to 2.23
> 
> The currently minimum-supported binutils version 2.21 has the problem of
> promoting symbols which are defined outside of a section into absolute.
> According to Arvind:
> 
>   binutils-2.21 and -2.22. An x86-64 defconfig will fail with
>           Invalid absolute R_X86_64_32S relocation: _etext
>   and after fixing that one, with
>           Invalid absolute R_X86_64_32S relocation: __end_of_kernel_reserve
> 
> Those two versions of binutils have a bug when it comes to handling
> symbols defined outside of a section and binutils 2.23 has the proper
> fix, see: https://sourceware.org/legacy-ml/binutils/2012-06/msg00155.html
> 
> Therefore, up to the fixed version directly, skipping the broken ones.
> 
> Currently shipping distros already have the fixed binutils version so
> there should be no breakage resulting from this.
> 
> For more details about the whole thing, see the thread in Link.

That sounds very good to me. Then we'll be able to use ADX instructions
without ifdefs.

Acked-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>