Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp4623355ybb; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 02:09:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vuvnJV7E90gE5OdCDbgBup1t+ieBXkJHqatJgB/EvdMiLkWYZ33Z28LQOTapp5lQX4cKI1O X-Received: by 2002:a9d:5789:: with SMTP id q9mr295409oth.288.1585040987698; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 02:09:47 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1585040987; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=JAnDV9xNWmCfFXDi6ys5wBDtd7q76um5kG0goWP4KYnp8i2uMIbQMxUIMTVlYaZsrh LHYWXucZE3N3F0RBZ1q5D7ldanSTn4LMyFqIM/yKfQlBQslqbWEITZ+iUVGQx1OUaGw9 uUxNJHMHw+sIEMDOwElGUQvApvZH7jYicmWQQT7oaBR6J1LEC5vnZ7GHXfd0dIuk0xEp ruOjcxRWvUlCBK6Dxeooo5ZTlc6Xu/N7sdFlBLxMVu6yH4icsXMt3U1Gm3icQzuxlj10 E+bjBoQvCBX5Aoa2uWOmsbpAXvPpCsSRYMkAlqHjF2yODDrz3jdzlOuOMLphzFkTJi0P 6FgA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=Q5cJrdiSP4+QQrJqfVPNmUDzA7i4ynYSE1vRDsFve3E=; b=K7BDB3gBiGEnUKqN8bADaW2FzOOwPnrHwhX0mK4FksWT60ma8LJy7j6uTcsTbCOAjT MUPyKTUd+n2CeKTRB0OPI8txBkjj8bLAujxlb54z1zqRwA1qxgIdEUerMI8QxrjYvASq yH6g06hsqdZWc1mQQij/FbGUy+aGVPOVQpnM+ebeQXqU/yYZNseGTvX4CjaLt+qoRLd8 CxMuUuDDuUZ/CDDq0OKYWJ9rOFpSXupmcs225VQ7Ii9N2NxbNquiTUcaA5G9z1ACYr1R LvEfZmTGzlFUaFcuHD/95w1zetFF+1kUa7r4DWTzc9Ph7VI58rWsKLTcdPBBshUYMV1H gtDg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l65si9028076oig.156.2020.03.24.02.09.34; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 02:09:47 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727194AbgCXJJD (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 05:09:03 -0400 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:12185 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726845AbgCXJJD (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 05:09:03 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS413-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 91A9F400B6F2CCFD201C; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:09:00 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.134.22.195] (10.134.22.195) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.213) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.487.0; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:08:58 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix long latency due to discard during umount To: Sahitya Tummala , Jaegeuk Kim , CC: References: <1584506689-5041-1-git-send-email-stummala@codeaurora.org> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: <54ae330b-ac9b-7968-fa0a-95db6737e3ea@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:08:58 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1584506689-5041-1-git-send-email-stummala@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.134.22.195] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2020/3/18 12:44, Sahitya Tummala wrote: > F2FS already has a default timeout of 5 secs for discards that > can be issued during umount, but it can take more than the 5 sec > timeout if the underlying UFS device queue is already full and there > are no more available free tags to be used. In that case, submit_bio() > will wait for the already queued discard requests to complete to get > a free tag, which can potentially take way more than 5 sec. > > Fix this by submitting the discard requests with REQ_NOWAIT > flags during umount. This will return -EAGAIN for UFS queue/tag full > scenario without waiting in the context of submit_bio(). The FS can > then handle these requests by retrying again within the stipulated > discard timeout period to avoid long latencies. > > Signed-off-by: Sahitya Tummala Reviewed-by: Chao Yu Thanks,