Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp4653331ybb; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 02:48:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvNsvAkF/pe7LPq7mnuRGVFX4S0TMQzvu1eGwYBImMaOOE+JT2DQbQgTf0XTaZqf9zSwdsL X-Received: by 2002:a9d:77d1:: with SMTP id w17mr13700090otl.44.1585043282840; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 02:48:02 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1585043282; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=igPEOT+SDyl07i3pg0YeUBaUPFu6a2iUh+jApZjLsE4tQ5WL3HiEYVaBwFnV1fzHWu /qSxoLoBHxVMrDHN7puivfxGc8YOtKJBWuF2cTcAat4oRPIWMu6czH9vSO2B19IJIEDo pHfzIMxfm9gbny9yqZgfnuc18ZSAqdzTS0qpe4/7ZPvYl7QvUpkeMChyW+8AZpswNlJI Y4tbvviiyCZGtX0YJLnzU0qCSfq3i7tnM1MTDkREPRsR/8gjCt2xZxC8GZhDuDvbLfI1 aXNs6LHrRMxU34iRF8dars4nzKIYFZ9i9SujUsPNVoWkcI8yNi6sCjESGfGde222C3qu hKMQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:references:cc:to:from:subject; bh=f32AZlamjk+67+t+gueAccd/35cJzVj3cWmujJ5LKWw=; b=bv2aFxL4HY7H3lISuyYAqf52+XjcOAF7QxTut4LUDl2K9sHl4UPMPoCfTduAp8Tff4 ftlXhMXosA9coZIF02T2/6jgP6fXkVJ1VGbAnDwnDqBRXcso1HUCgcdRVYXt8o+uCfmT sTB3yLrxeD2Vb2Jag++jYzZC+G1Q+24iNB34ngEL9OaqUpSLNmBu9H9r6JrTI1/uvdBY 8AmBdgid2kunm1JajuinkclBufYyq/EgiRE95xyAnuqEOdFX/p8WYXc8Ho3NaOtZx0Xs 2ZhpOh3XQkNTnotMz12O91aU/WYlDIN0/DVtubOhLT7BmoidGTJuwq+57yvajpizzKO6 wVAQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z204si9317109oiz.133.2020.03.24.02.47.50; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 02:48:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727095AbgCXJrT (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 05:47:19 -0400 Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.35]:51826 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726129AbgCXJrT (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 05:47:19 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS404-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 534E12E87DCB9A5B1249; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:47:10 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.134.22.195] (10.134.22.195) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.487.0; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:47:04 +0800 Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix long latency due to discard during umount From: Chao Yu To: Sahitya Tummala , Jaegeuk Kim , CC: References: <1584506689-5041-1-git-send-email-stummala@codeaurora.org> <54ae330b-ac9b-7968-fa0a-95db6737e3ea@huawei.com> Message-ID: <7804a289-ee55-930c-8b6a-52697d3db679@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 17:47:03 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <54ae330b-ac9b-7968-fa0a-95db6737e3ea@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.134.22.195] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2020/3/24 17:08, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2020/3/18 12:44, Sahitya Tummala wrote: >> F2FS already has a default timeout of 5 secs for discards that >> can be issued during umount, but it can take more than the 5 sec >> timeout if the underlying UFS device queue is already full and there >> are no more available free tags to be used. In that case, submit_bio() >> will wait for the already queued discard requests to complete to get >> a free tag, which can potentially take way more than 5 sec. >> >> Fix this by submitting the discard requests with REQ_NOWAIT >> flags during umount. This will return -EAGAIN for UFS queue/tag full >> scenario without waiting in the context of submit_bio(). The FS can >> then handle these requests by retrying again within the stipulated >> discard timeout period to avoid long latencies. BTW, I guess later we can add nowait logic as a sub policy of discard_policy, then DPOLICY_BG would be more configurable with this nowait policy support. Thanks, >> >> Signed-off-by: Sahitya Tummala > > Reviewed-by: Chao Yu > > Thanks, > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list > Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel > . >