Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750857AbWBVCfA (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2006 21:35:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750843AbWBVCfA (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2006 21:35:00 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:21647 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750725AbWBVCfA (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2006 21:35:00 -0500 Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 18:33:06 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, haveblue@us.ibm.com, Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove zone_mem_map Message-Id: <20060221183306.3d467d14.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <43FBAEBA.2020300@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <43FBAEBA.2020300@jp.fujitsu.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 691 Lines: 17 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > This patch removes zone_mem_map from zone. > By this, (generic) page_to_pfn and pfn_to_page can use the same logic. I assume this is dependent upon unify-pfn_to_page-*.patch? > This modifies page_to_pfn implementation. Could anyone do performance test on NUMA ? Do you expect there to be NUMA performance problems? If so, how do they arise and what sort of tests should be run? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/