Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp5079164ybb; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:33:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtuPQiXfe7imY2mdIo6nwWAO0mUXG3im1N1hIFHHEcK8rgR1afmXLQxUUvUd2av3Wcc8SL8 X-Received: by 2002:aca:3a83:: with SMTP id h125mr4127847oia.64.1585071199452; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:33:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1585071199; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KkvvyanxauXBYr8DBvFYF9hFE2sLxg7zi/zzSggABAADhEuIpW08GFofl7gOYcfD44 n8jyeyWVpcp5fm5D8x9b4MB9g1zHppb3elZX5U+jwnC2aLYAUPyhSfeyTxxBBcHoi+Ta P+QbSh9tGixBgbIcd+kEjZOSIGbQuaxEuQJLYRYFveTL5y7T00iqdkBThfdhbSVvfNKo MObioJsyNVg9ibxRcytIu5FJ3LXQvgOGuUZY75LU16A7GLdSLdHNWZ7wd6FGzU8PBnSr lRoC8ed9ovtY+4Ow6HSJV9KXensM+9jC/Sy4s+n5HHAxZ+9vNwx45KLZal9zWCR1pF9P SUbA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature:dkim-filter; bh=Xv8QceqshOBI8Wr/8hADstw0UzLndq6ibetmQTGIu8I=; b=gZfkDoRREHqIkO9CYDdlnh6NUMr4tyiRh3mo7PXt/uwm7NCuFGeFTd54mbn4OJyKVS UylL90mST0jd1Jsq7A7b2Q5lsG6h6Z5V94psZOowgJtVDM6l4/DH69lp+6e3N0Uxx1QS 6XqzCumBIvbq/rBk5toPsUEsWcBINMvJndTMPWtjdlD3eWwWGJGwIRe/61hcN4O0bZDL rIhyvZpKQF4sCrV/9Oa3BHvxq3p8DiM03WYrpO/SQy5BjKFyk2X5pp5KI2UUkGjLOQ3G Z50pgahmy+plhlv5wTSkM0+iHv+8E1+9bopTyKnaOpfaDkZ6es4rtlotVEAm0dwgnaLJ t3AA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@nifty.com header.s=dec2015msa header.b=rBHjS74f; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w12si9596140otq.75.2020.03.24.10.33.06; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:33:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@nifty.com header.s=dec2015msa header.b=rBHjS74f; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727715AbgCXRcE (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 13:32:04 -0400 Received: from conssluserg-05.nifty.com ([210.131.2.90]:17456 "EHLO conssluserg-05.nifty.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727223AbgCXRcD (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 13:32:03 -0400 Received: from mail-vs1-f44.google.com (mail-vs1-f44.google.com [209.85.217.44]) (authenticated) by conssluserg-05.nifty.com with ESMTP id 02OHVt37003399 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 02:31:56 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conssluserg-05.nifty.com 02OHVt37003399 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1585071116; bh=Xv8QceqshOBI8Wr/8hADstw0UzLndq6ibetmQTGIu8I=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=rBHjS74fHmi/Vsm1h/jZTJ/r+lq/RoOin2H83K6lnhfLB+EvFunVyhfDRBbXSNmXX MXbrywVuxK115JT2wWQ7iy/U8JOFC636+SeO04NanX7qTIhGv0AOt2IxD3sclyd+Bj 79lPEEamP6SZ+o6TaQVIuSofw8L4oGjGu49+MqWXTtjjuLrRY/AyhSagT4TZwvlsji aWLB4iFbJVqESFaI+h1FxEM2FVi0SK2VylGWmhQhBBe8cj2SuzQxnUE+2bSuiDJMI1 +LNeCkvlTo7RuDx2Z+qJ18+It0TsbbWlWIblF+u2gKljbq0mraGcyNJLtoAgOMlIwW 7RFilgyEO5oAg== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [209.85.217.44] Received: by mail-vs1-f44.google.com with SMTP id a63so11676607vsa.8 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:31:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1tnvDuGcYySRJzu22Bo62YSFGZL0RTBgOwZ2LuyB3zWJnT7ltK 0gb+vF8WEyNaub9lZsnParIf9vocDpFhABPLVqU= X-Received: by 2002:a67:33cb:: with SMTP id z194mr21777249vsz.155.1585071114650; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:31:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200113195337.604646-1-nivedita@alum.mit.edu> <202001131750.C1B8468@keescook> <20200114165135.GK31032@zn.tnic> <20200115002131.GA3258770@rani.riverdale.lan> <20200115122458.GB20975@zn.tnic> <20200316160259.GN26126@zn.tnic> <20200323204454.GA2611336@zx2c4.com> <202003231350.7D35351@keescook> <20200324153847.GA2870597@rani.riverdale.lan> In-Reply-To: <20200324153847.GA2870597@rani.riverdale.lan> From: Masahiro Yamada Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 02:31:17 +0900 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/changes: Raise minimum supported binutils version to 2.23 To: Arvind Sankar Cc: Kees Cook , Borislav Petkov , "Jason A. Donenfeld" , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , X86 ML , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Thomas Lendacky , Mauro Rossi , Michael Matz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 12:38 AM Arvind Sankar wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 06:12:01PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 6:02 PM Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > > > > > Hi. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 5:51 AM Kees Cook wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 02:44:54PM -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 05:02:59PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > > > > > Long overdue patch, see below. > > > > > > > > > > > > Plan is to queue it after 5.7-rc1. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > From: Borislav Petkov > > > > > > Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 16:28:36 +0100 > > > > > > Subject: [PATCH] Documentation/changes: Raise minimum supported binutilsa version to 2.23 > > > > > > > > > > > > The currently minimum-supported binutils version 2.21 has the problem of > > > > > > promoting symbols which are defined outside of a section into absolute. > > > > > > According to Arvind: > > > > > > > > > > > > binutils-2.21 and -2.22. An x86-64 defconfig will fail with > > > > > > Invalid absolute R_X86_64_32S relocation: _etext > > > > > > and after fixing that one, with > > > > > > Invalid absolute R_X86_64_32S relocation: __end_of_kernel_reserve > > > > > > > > > > > > Those two versions of binutils have a bug when it comes to handling > > > > > > symbols defined outside of a section and binutils 2.23 has the proper > > > > > > fix, see: https://sourceware.org/legacy-ml/binutils/2012-06/msg00155.html > > > > > > This seems to be also related to > > 7883a14339299773b2ce08dcfd97c63c199a9289 > > > > > > I had noticed the symbol "_text" > > was absolute on binutils <= 2.22, > > but I was not sure whether it was a bug of the tool. > > > > I applied the fix. > > Perhaps, it was unneeded given that > > we require the binutils 2.23 > > > > Which architecture? x86 at least doesn't even build with <= 2.22, but > adding workarounds for that shows _text as section-relative (T in nm > output). The reporter found this for PowerPC, but I think this could happen on any architecture. https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11430243/ -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada