Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:53:31 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
        Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Lendacky <Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com>,
        Mauro Rossi <issor.oruam@gmail.com>,
        Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/changes: Raise minimum supported binutils
 version to 2.23
Message-ID: <202003241051.D2CF0F0@keescook>
References: <20200115002131.GA3258770@rani.riverdale.lan>
 <20200115122458.GB20975@zn.tnic>
 <20200316160259.GN26126@zn.tnic>
 <20200323204454.GA2611336@zx2c4.com>
 <202003231350.7D35351@keescook>
 <CAK7LNARMBkc666kZ9jOG9sSThzA69JvKi++WZXMtCP9ddyqcBw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200324091437.GB22931@zn.tnic>
 <CAHmME9q2VuhN+Dhi-nzuJKPjXo8dZq013cZ-0x0t9StZFXCAJQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200324162843.GE22931@zn.tnic>
 <CAHk-=whXBO-Z=Ra_UX=w_LefG1r6iLXcPT=sLuZ+EaKFtWtCBQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=whXBO-Z=Ra_UX=w_LefG1r6iLXcPT=sLuZ+EaKFtWtCBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 09:37:13AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 9:28 AM Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
> >
> > Are you or Kees going to deal with any fallout from upping the binutils
> > version, rushed in in the last week before the merge window?
> 
> I think it's ok. It's not going to cause any _subtle_ failures, it's
> going to cause very clear "oh, now it doesn't build" errors.
> 
> No?
> 
> And binutils 2.23 is what, 7+ years old by now and apparently had
> known failure cases too.
> 
> But if there are silent and subtle failures, that might be a reason to
> be careful. Are there?

FWIW, I have plenty of other hills to die on, so I have no urgency on
this change. I actually thought it had already happened, since it was
brought up a while ago. :) I am just excited to see it happen since it
unblocks other work I've been touching. As long as it's "eventually",
I don't care when. :)

-- 
Kees Cook