Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 24 Mar 2020 14:26:15 -0400
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To:     Marco Ballesio <balejs@google.com>
Cc:     Daniel Colascione <dancol@google.com>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, lizefan@huawei.com,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, len.brown@intel.com,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Minchan Kim <minchan@google.com>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup-v1: freezer: optionally killable freezer
Message-ID: <20200324182615.GF162390@mtj.duckdns.org>
References: <20200219183231.50985-1-balejs@google.com>
 <20200303134855.GA186184@mtj.thefacebook.com>
 <CAKOZuevzE=0Oa8gn--rkVJ8t69S+o2vK--pki65XXg6EVuOhMQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200320201038.GB79184@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200320201038.GB79184@google.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hello,

On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 01:10:38PM -0700, Marco Ballesio wrote:
> It might also be desirable for userland to have a way to modify the behavior of
> an already mounted v1 freezer.
> 
> Tejun, would it be acceptable to have a flag but disable it by default, hiding
> it behind a kernel configuration option?

Given how dead-end this is, I'm not sure this needs to be upstream. Can you give
me some rationales?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun