Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 24 Mar 2020 21:08:09 +0000
From:   Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Maddie Stone <maddiestone@google.com>,
        Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, kernel-team@android.com,
        kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 17/21] linux/bit_spinlock.h: Include linux/processor.h
Message-ID: <20200324210808.GA19527@willie-the-truck>
References: <20200324153643.15527-1-will@kernel.org>
 <20200324153643.15527-18-will@kernel.org>
 <20200324162820.GD2518046@kroah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200324162820.GD2518046@kroah.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 05:28:20PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 03:36:39PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Needed for cpu_relax().
> 
> Is this needed now, or for the next patch?  And if for next patch, why
> not just add it then?

If the next patch correctly included linux/list_bl.h like it was supposed
to, then yes, it's needed there. I'll sort that out and fold this in for
v2.

Cheers,

Will