Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200115122458.GB20975@zn.tnic> <20200316160259.GN26126@zn.tnic>
 <20200323204454.GA2611336@zx2c4.com> <202003231350.7D35351@keescook>
 <CAK7LNARMBkc666kZ9jOG9sSThzA69JvKi++WZXMtCP9ddyqcBw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200324091437.GB22931@zn.tnic> <CAHmME9q2VuhN+Dhi-nzuJKPjXo8dZq013cZ-0x0t9StZFXCAJQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200324162843.GE22931@zn.tnic> <CAHk-=whXBO-Z=Ra_UX=w_LefG1r6iLXcPT=sLuZ+EaKFtWtCBQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200324164812.GG22931@zn.tnic> <20200324214204.GB3220053@rani.riverdale.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20200324214204.GB3220053@rani.riverdale.lan>
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:14:38 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wiFfi8J+vMccQ5VYZMecxyAeA9Cpt-Kui-GHZBbB29OhA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/changes: Raise minimum supported binutils
 version to 2.23
To:     Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
Cc:     Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Lendacky <Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com>,
        Mauro Rossi <issor.oruam@gmail.com>,
        Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 2:42 PM Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>
> This is just a documentation patch right?

That patch, yes.

However, there's a second patch that knows that if we have binutils >=
2.22, then we don't need to check for AVX2 or ADX support, because we
know it's there.

           Linus