Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 19 Oct 2001 21:59:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 19 Oct 2001 21:58:50 -0400 Received: from mail11.speakeasy.net ([216.254.0.211]:7442 "EHLO mail11.speakeasy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 19 Oct 2001 21:58:33 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: safemode To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: swap with samba question using 2.4.12-ac3 Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 21:58:59 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <20011020015841Z278715-17408+2574@vger.kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ok, this is strange. I'm stating about 3000 mp3s and they are on my linux box on a samba share. Now this is on a 100mbit network so it's going at 4+MB/s. I started compiling avifile and i noticed that my swap usage was at 105MB. Not sure how it got that way as most of my ram (660MB) is being used as cache. I'm not seeing any io so i'm guessing it's just mapped, not actually being used. My real question is: is it possible to just give the value of swap actually being used as the swap use number? We have a breakdown of ram usage, but i dont know of any breakdown of swap usage ( actual use vs. mapped). It's just a bit decieving when you glance at it and you see ram free 2MB swap use 105MB but then you realize that 87% of your ram is still being used as cache so you can't possibly be actually using 105MB of swap. Heh. smooth sailing though. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/