Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc:     Pratik Rajesh Sampat <psampat@linux.ibm.com>,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pratik.r.sampat@gmail.com,
        ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com, dja@axtens.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: powernv: Fix frame-size-overflow in powernv_cpufreq_work_fn
Date:   Wed, 25 Mar 2020 11:36:18 +0100
Message-ID: <7394005.IE404Cl4Vv@kreacher>
In-Reply-To: <87h7yexnu7.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
References: <20200316135743.57735-1-psampat@linux.ibm.com> <1921198.IfoiWgUDIW@kreacher> <87h7yexnu7.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tuesday, March 24, 2020 7:34:56 AM CET Michael Ellerman wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> writes:
> > On Monday, March 16, 2020 2:57:43 PM CET Pratik Rajesh Sampat wrote:
> >> The patch avoids allocating cpufreq_policy on stack hence fixing frame
> >> size overflow in 'powernv_cpufreq_work_fn'
> >> 
> >> Fixes: 227942809b52 ("cpufreq: powernv: Restore cpu frequency to policy->cur on unthrottling")
> >> Signed-off-by: Pratik Rajesh Sampat <psampat@linux.ibm.com>
> >
> > Any objections or concerns here?
> >
> > If not, I'll queue it up.
> 
> I have it in my testing branch,

Great!

> but if you pick it up I can drop it.

Let it go in through your tree.

Cheers!