Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
To:     <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
CC:     <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <krzysztof.struczynski@huawei.com>,
        <silviu.vlasceanu@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] ima: Remove redundant policy rule set in add_rules()
Date:   Wed, 25 Mar 2020 17:14:54 +0100
Message-ID: <20200325161455.7610-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200325161116.7082-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
References: <20200325161116.7082-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

From: Krzysztof Struczynski <krzysztof.struczynski@huawei.com>

Function ima_appraise_flag() returns the flag to be set in
temp_ima_appraise depending on the hook identifier passed as an argument.
It is not necessary to set the flag again for the POLICY_CHECK hook.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Struczynski <krzysztof.struczynski@huawei.com>
---
 security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index c334e0dc6083..ea9b991f0232 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -643,11 +643,8 @@ static void add_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *entries, int count,
 
 			list_add_tail(&entry->list, &ima_policy_rules);
 		}
-		if (entries[i].action == APPRAISE) {
+		if (entries[i].action == APPRAISE)
 			temp_ima_appraise |= ima_appraise_flag(entries[i].func);
-			if (entries[i].func == POLICY_CHECK)
-				temp_ima_appraise |= IMA_APPRAISE_POLICY;
-		}
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.17.1