Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 08:14:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 08:14:31 -0400 Received: from smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.137]:9479 "EHLO smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 08:14:18 -0400 Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 14:14:54 +0200 From: thunder7 To: Krzysztof Oledzki Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: bug in "raid5: measuring checksumming speed" Message-ID: <20011020141454.A7819@xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from ole@ans.pl on Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 01:54:54PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 01:54:54PM +0200, Krzysztof Oledzki wrote: > Hello, > > It seems that there is something wrong with measuring checksumming speed - > on my two P3 boxes linux chooses pIII_sse but pII_mmx and p5_mmx are > reported as faster instructions: > I read somewhere that PIII_sse has better cache behaviour. You could check this by reading the source, of course. Good luck, Jurriaan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/