Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751546AbWBVXp6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2006 18:45:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751557AbWBVXp6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2006 18:45:58 -0500 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:65425 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751553AbWBVXp5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2006 18:45:57 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Nigel Cunningham Subject: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 00:45:58 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Dmitry Torokhov , Andreas Happe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suspend2 Devel List References: <20060201113710.6320.68289.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <200602221949.31933.rjw@sisk.pl> <200602230841.10227.ncunningham@cyclades.com> In-Reply-To: <200602230841.10227.ncunningham@cyclades.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602230045.59238.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3369 Lines: 69 Hi, On Wednesday 22 February 2006 23:41, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > On Thursday 23 February 2006 04:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > Frankly, I didn't think of dropping PBEs right now, but in the long run > > > > that's worth considering, IMO. The advantage of PBEs is that they are > > > > easy to handle in the assembly parts, but apart from this they are a > > > > bit wasteful (not very much, though). > > > > > > Fully agree. That's why I've sought to keep the copying in c - it makes > > > it simpler to read and maintain (although at the expense of a little bit > > > of ugliness with that if in the stack page allocation > > > > Well, that's a bit too much ugliness for me, sorry. > > > > > or (old way) working hard to make the C not use stack). > > > > I'd rather not get rid of the assembly parts. Instead, I'd modify them to > > handle bitmaps. I'm not going to drop them. > > Well, if you do this, and I can, I will start using the code too. I don't know > x86/x86_64/ppc/... assembly enough that I could help, but I would be willing > to drop the current code if yours was usable. Come to that, (as I already > said), I'm willing to work on switching to pbes prior to that and seeing if > we can share that code earlier, if you want me to and I can find the time. Yes, it would be nice if we could share some code earlier. However I think the freezer is a better target short-term. If you could have a look at the -mm freezer and tell us what you'd like to add to that, we'd probably be able to get closer in that area. > > > > The fact that we use page flags to store some suspend/resume-related > > > > information is a big disadvantage in my view, and I'd like to get rid > > > > of that in the future. In principle we could use a bitmap, or rather > > > > two of them, to store the same information independently of the page > > > > flags, and if we use bitmaps for this purpose, we can use them also > > > > instead of PBEs. > > > > > > If you use the 'dynamically allocated pageflags' code (sure, pick a > > > better name if you want), these changes will be pretty trivial - you can > > > #define macros that could make the transition just a matter of switching > > > PageNosave (eg) to PageSomethingElse. (Ditto for setting and clearing > > > flags). > > > > I think it could be done without that code and I'd prefer to do so. In > > fact, we only need to remember: > > (a) saveable pages > > (b) pages used to store the data from (a) > > (c) pages allocated by us that we should release eventually > > (generally that may be a broader set than just (b)). > > That's 3 bitmaps total and no need for using any more sophisticated stuff, > > if I remember everything correctly. > > Maybe I have tunnel vision, but I'd be surprised if you didn't end up with > something similar - I've tried to make it as simple as possible, and am > basically doing the same thing (even if I'm using different terms for some of > the concepts). I'd certainly be willing to interact on "Why did you do it > this way?" questions and make changes if a better way is shown to me. OK Greetings, Rafael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/